ARTICLE
6 January 2020

Federal Register: FSOC Approves Activities-Based Approach For Combating Systemic Risks

HL
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Contributor

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes matters.

Operating at the intersection of business, finance, and government, we bring an unwavering commitment to client service and the decisive counsel that helps clients achieve exceptional results.

Consistently recognized for innovation across legal services, we combine sharp judgment with deep commercial perspective and intellectual rigor to address critical, cutting-edge challenges.

With 3,100 lawyers worldwide, we offer global scale with strong local insight in the markets that matter most. Our commitment extends beyond client work through pro bono activities, community investment, and responsible business practices.

The Financial Stability Oversight Council ("FSOC") interpretive guidance establishing an "activities-based approach" to address systemic risk was published in the Federal Register
United States Finance and Banking
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader are most popular:
  • within Intellectual Property, Government, Public Sector, Food, Drugs, Healthcare and Life Sciences topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Consumer Industries industries

The Financial Stability Oversight Council ("FSOC") interpretive guidance establishing an "activities-based approach" to address systemic risk was published in the Federal Register. The interpretive guidance will become effective on January 29, 2020.

As previously covered, FSOC will:

  • identify, evaluate and address potential risks to U.S. financial stability that arise from particular activities and seek to adopt regulations applicable to those activities, rather than making determinations relating to a single entity;
  • perform a cost-benefit analysis when considering a nonbank financial company for a potential determination under section 113 of the Dodd-Frank Act;
  • evaluate the risk of a "nonbank financial company's material financial distress" when assessing that firm for a potential designation;
  • combine the prior three-stage determination process under section 113 into two stages;
  • improve the new two-stage determination process by updating the procedure and incorporating provisions from the 2015 Supplemental Procedures;
  • clarify the post-designation "off-ramp" to rescind a determination regarding a particular company; and
  • eliminate the six-category framework outlined in the 2012 Interpretive Guidance.

Commentary

Steven Lofchie

If the open-ended authority provided FSOC is not to be eliminated, at least the government is taking steps to formalize the process so that it may be applied with an even hand.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More