ARTICLE
19 October 2015

Death Threats And Unfriending – What Is Bullying?

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
Bullying behaviour comes in all shapes and sizes. Identifying and deciding how to respond to diverse bullying behaviour by a worker (or workers) can create challenges for employers.
United States Employment and HR

Bullying behaviour comes in all shapes and sizes.  Identifying and deciding how to respond to diverse bullying behaviour by a worker (or workers) can create challenges for employers.

Recent headlines have cautioned that unfriending on Facebook could be considered bullying. That this seemingly innocuous action has been elevated to "bullying" has been the subject of many concerned water-cooler discussions since hitting the mainstream press.

Another case making a splash involved a death threat, which was found not to constitute bullying.  Yet, at least at first glance, a death threat is surely worse than hitting the "Unfriend" button.

The reason behind these two diverse outcomes is that the Facebook-user's conduct met the test of bullying, while the conduct of the cleaner who made the death threat did not.  Bullying depends on whether

  • there has been repeated unreasonable behaviour towards the worker (or group of workers of which the worker is a member); and
  • the behaviour creates a risk to health and safety.

The unfriending was part of repeated unreasonable behaviour towards another worker, while the death threat was a "one-off".

For employers, identifying whether particular conduct counts as bullying under the legislation is only one consideration.  There will sometimes be instances where behaviour does not constitute bullying under the legislation, but still breaches an employer's policy, or work, health and safety law.

Employers need to address inappropriate behaviour, and ensure they are complying with their obligation to provide a safe workplace. At the front-end, this is done via culture, policies and procedures that set expectations of conduct, and at the back end, by taking disciplinary action where necessary and by being transparent when doing so.

Ultimately, once particular behaviour of concern is identified, the circumstances should inform the employer's response.  Unfriending will not always constitute bullying or inappropriate behaviour requiring the employer to intervene.  Likewise, a threat could constitute bullying, if it is part of a pattern of unreasonable conduct.  And even if it is not repeated, inappropriate conduct could still require the employer to take action to ensure a healthy and safe workplace.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More