ARTICLE
27 August 2015

New NLRB Test For Joint-Employer Status In Labor Contracts May Leave You On the Hook

SH
Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
Contributor
Schnader is a full-service law firm of 160 attorneys with offices in Pennsylvania, New York, California, Washington, D.C., New Jersey, Delaware and an affiliation with a law firm in Jakarta. We provide businesses, government entities, and nonprofit organizations throughout the world with innovative, practical, and cost-effective solutions to their business and litigation needs. We also provide wealth management and an array of personal legal services to individuals.
Today, in a split decision, the National Labor Relations Board promulgated a new test that will make it easier for employees to establish joint-employer status in labor contracting arrangements.
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Today, in a split decision, the National Labor Relations Board promulgated a new test that will make it easier for employees to establish joint-employer status in labor contracting arrangements.   Under the "restated" legal standard for joint-employer status, the Board "may find that two or more entities are joint em­ployers of a single work force if they are both employers within the meaning of the common law, and if they share or codetermine those matters governing the essential terms and conditions of employment."  The Board went on to say that "in evaluating the allocation and exercise of control in the workplace, we will consider the various ways in which joint employers may "share" control over terms and conditions of em­ployment or "codetermine" them, as the Board and the courts have done in the past."

Under the Board's more liberal test, joint employer status will be found where the employers share or codetermine "those matters governing the essential terms and conditions of employment."  Such essential terms and conditions include hiring, firing, discipline, supervision, direction of work and hours, and the determination of wages.

The likely impact of this decision will be that companies believing they were insulated from union organizing campaigns and/or unfair labor practice charges aimed at their labor contractors could now be jointly on the hook.

The Decision Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., d/b/a BFI Newby Island Recyclery, and FPR-II, LLC, d/b/a Leadpoint Business Services, and Sanitary Truck Drivers and Helpers Local 350, Interna­tional Brotherhood of Teamsters, Petitioner. Case 32–RC 109684 can be found at http://apps.nlrb.gov/link/document.aspx/09031d4581d99106

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
27 August 2015

New NLRB Test For Joint-Employer Status In Labor Contracts May Leave You On the Hook

United States Employment and HR
Contributor
Schnader is a full-service law firm of 160 attorneys with offices in Pennsylvania, New York, California, Washington, D.C., New Jersey, Delaware and an affiliation with a law firm in Jakarta. We provide businesses, government entities, and nonprofit organizations throughout the world with innovative, practical, and cost-effective solutions to their business and litigation needs. We also provide wealth management and an array of personal legal services to individuals.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More