ARTICLE
10 September 2024

What Is An Account Freezing Order?

G
Gherson

Contributor

Founded in 1988 by Roger Gherson, Gherson Solicitors LLP was first established as a boutique immigration law firm based in London. Now servicing clients across all areas of immigration, international protection and human rights, white collar crime, sanctions, and civil litigation and arbitration, Gherson LLP’s offices continue to expand across Europe.

With over 35 years of experience, Gherson’s expertise extends from meeting the migration needs of international business people and UK-based companies to litigation in all UK jurisdictions and the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice.

The article explains Account Freezing Orders (AFrO), which freeze funds suspected to be linked to crime. It details the legal process, including how to challenge AFrOs and Account Forfeiture Orders (AFOs), and emphasizes the importance of seeking expert legal advice.
United Kingdom Criminal Law

This blog will explain what an account freezing order is before outlining potential steps to respond effectively to an account freezing order.

An Account Freezing Order ("AFrO") is an order made by a Court freezing funds in a bank or building society account. An AFrO is, therefore, made by a Magistrates' Court (the "Court"). The Court will make the AFrO if a senior officer at a relevant agency (including the Serious Fraud Office, Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs, the National Crime Agency or the Police) can persuade the Court that funds in the relevant account are:

  • the proceeds of crime (either within or outside the UK), or
  • intended for use in criminal conduct.

Reasonable grounds to suspect that the funds are the proceeds of crime

For the AFrO to be granted, the relevant agency must persuade the Court on the balance probabilities (i.e. more likely than not) that there are reasonably grounds to suspect that the funds in the account are the proceeds of crime or are intended for use in criminal conduct. Usually, this is not a significant obstacle for law enforcement to overcome. The evidence which law enforcement needs to provide the court at this stage is very limited.

Length of AFrO

If the Court does grant the AFrO, then the funds in the account can be frozen for up to two years. This is to give the relevant agency time to investigate the legitimacy of the funds in the account.

What is an Account Forfeiture Order?

If, following the imposition of an AFrO, the relevant agency is of the view following its investigation that the funds in the account subject to the AFrO are the proceeds of crime, or are intended for use in criminal conduct, then the relevant agency can apply for the funds in the relevant account to be forfeited.

The forfeiture process involves offering the respondent a chance to object to forfeiture. If no objection is received within 30 days, then the funds in the account are forfeited.

If the respondent does raise an objection, then the relevant authority must make an application to the Court for an Account Forfeiture Order ("AFO") to forfeit the funds in the account.

Funds are the proceeds of crime

At this stage, for the AFO to be granted, the relevant agency must persuade the Court on the balance of probabilities that the funds in the relevant account are the proceeds of crime (either within or outside the UK) or are intended for use in criminal conduct. This is a higher standard of proof for law enforcement to satisfy vis-a-vis the standard of proof required for the original AFrO. There is no requirement for there to be any criminal investigation open, nor any criminal conviction, against the respondent.

How to challenge an Account Freezing Order or an Account Forfeiture Order

It is important that for those whose account(s) is subject to an AFrO to seek expert legal advice as soon as possible. An AFrO may be made with or without notice; as such, the first you may be aware of an AFrO is when you are notified that one has been granted.

Applying for an AFrO, and if applicable an AFO, involves the relevant agency taking a staged approach and it is important to adopt a strategic response accordingly. As such, the most effective response will often involve a combination (or all) of the following (non-exhaustive) steps:

  • engaging with the relevant agency;
  • attending an interview (if appropriate);
  • making written representation accompanied by evidence;
  • trying to establish that there are (or were) insufficient grounds to persuade the Court to grant the AFrO and/or that there are insufficient grounds to persuade a Court to grant a AFO; and
  • establishing any procedurally incorrect actions taken by law enforcement.

Given the higher standard of proof which law enforcement needs to satisfy at the AFO stage, it may be better for the account holder in some cases to contest the matter at this stage.

It is critically important that the appropriate steps are taken during the investigation stage, as these should bolster representations made if the matter does end up at a full forfeiture Court hearing. As such, early expert legal advice is always recommended.

Gherson's white-collar crime team brings experience from both sides of the fence through experience leading investigations into financial crime and also representing individuals subject to such investigations. As such they, are able to offer a bespoke and insightful strategy to provide the best chance to head off any investigation at as an early stage as possible.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More