We are a contemporary London law firm, rooted in tradition with a lasting legacy of client service. Founded in 1780, we recognise the long-standing relationships we have with our clients and how they have helped shape our past and provide a platform for our future.
With 76 partners supported by over 300 lawyers and support staff, we operate on a four practice group model: private client, business services, real estate and dispute resolution.
Our driving force is to empower our clients by providing quality legal advice, insight and intelligence that enables them to achieve their goals whether personal or business. We are large enough to advise on the most complex matters, but small enough to ensure that our people and our work remain exceptional and dynamic.
Building relationships is at the heart of everything we do.
Assos v Asos is a good example of how two apparently very similar trade marks can be held to co-exist side by side despite appearing to inhabit similar territory, and how it can be dangerous to adopt too simplistic a view of infringement and passing off. It is not enough to simply say "the marks are similar and what they are being used for is similar –therefore there must always be infringement".
Assos v Asos is a good example of how two apparently very
similar trade marks can be held to co-exist side by side despite
appearing to inhabit similar territory, and how it can be dangerous
to adopt too simplistic a view of infringement and passing off. It
is not enough to simply say "the marks are similar and what
they are being used for is similar –therefore there must
always be infringement". Trade mark law works more subtly than
that.
Despite the very similar competing marks – ASOS and ASSOS
–there was, ultimately, no actionable infringement or passing
off.
The case also demonstrates how survey evidence and other
artificial means of obtaining evidence of confusion can, in certain
circumstances, end up backfiring. In this case, both the
survey and the prize draw had the effect of strengthening the judge
in his view that there was no infringement or passing off
occurring. The analysis of the Google analytics and other web
data appears to have had the same effect too.
It remains to be seen whether Assos will want to appeal this
judgment in the hope that the Court of Appeal takes a different
view of the evidence. There certainly is a recent precedent
for that happening.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
