ARTICLE
15 July 2025

New UKIPO Practice Amendment On Overly Broad Specifications And Bad Faith

KL
Keltie LLP

Contributor

Keltie’s team of IP attorneys are highly skilled, hugely experienced and above all, great people to work with. At Keltie we want to understand the essence of your invention, or help get to the core of your brand. We are commercial, driven and fundamentally passionate about what we do.
The UKIPO has issued a new Practice Amendment Notice (PAN 1/25) in response to the Supreme Court's landmark ruling in the case SkyKick UK Ltd v Sky Ltd (2024 UKSC 36).
United Kingdom Intellectual Property

The UKIPO has issued a new Practice Amendment Notice (PAN 1/25) in response to the Supreme Court's landmark ruling in the case SkyKick UK Ltd v Sky Ltd (2024 UKSC 36).

The PAN states that the UKIPO may now object to trade mark applications which include overly broad terms, or unduly long lists of goods/services, if it believes that those terms were included in bad faith (i.e. if the list of goods and services is not fair, or reasonable, in the context of the applicant's business).

The circumstances of each application will be different, and therefore the UKIPO cannot set any firm rules as to exactly what will, and will not, lead to a bad faith objection. However, there are a couple of circumstances that will inevitably lead to a bad faith objection being raised:

  • Filing in all 45 classes;
  • Filing for all goods in Class 9 (a very broad class covering a diverse range of goods from fire extinguishers to sunglasses).

Other factors that will be considered by the UKIPO when assessing the fairness and reasonableness of the list of goods and services include:

  • If the application includes vast numbers of goods and services in large numbers of classes;
  • Use of class headings across multiple classes;
  • Use of terms that are overly broad by their nature, such as 'computer software' in Class 9, 'pharmaceuticals' in Class 5, and 'clothing' in Class 25, for example.

Filing for broad terms like these will not automatically lead to an objection; however, applicants should consider whether sub categories might better capture how the mark is intended to be used.

If the UKIPO raises an objection, the applicant will have a 2-month period to either explain the commercial rationale behind the inclusion of the objectionable goods/services or submit restrictions. Should the objections be maintained, the applicant can appeal or request a hearing.

It is recommended that you get in touch with UK qualified trade mark attorneys when filing new applications to ensure that objections are not received. Keltie can assist with the drafting of suitable specifications and responding to refusals.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More