ARTICLE
5 February 2025

Recent Decision May Open The Door For UK Holiday Pay Claims Going Back More Than Two Years

MB
Mayer Brown

Contributor

Mayer Brown is a distinctively global law firm, uniquely positioned to advise the world’s leading companies and financial institutions on their most complex deals and disputes. We have deep experience in high-stakes litigation and complex transactions across industry sectors, including our signature strength, the global financial services industry.
An interesting employment tribunal decision has been handed down in the case of Afshar and others v Addison Lee: https://shorturl.at/Svqn3.
United Kingdom Employment and HR

An interesting employment tribunal decision has been handed down in the case of Afshar and others v Addison Lee: https://shorturl.at/Svqn3.

In finding that the Addison Lee drivers were workers and not self-employed, the judge also ruled that the drivers' claims to unpaid wages (holiday pay and national minimum wage) should not be limited to the two year backstop on unlawful deductions claims. That was because the regulations that, in 2015, amended the deductions provisions in the Employment Rights Act 1996 by introducing the two-year backstop (The Deduction from Wages (Limitation) Regulations), are ultra vires and so unlawful.

The Regulations were introduced to reduce the impact of holiday pay claims that could otherwise stretch back several years where there is a 'series of deductions'. They were introduced under the European Communities Act 1972 (ECA), which allowed the UK government to implement secondary legislation in order for the UK to comply with its EU obligations. Under the EU principle of equivalence, rights which arise under EU law cannot be more difficult to enforce than equivalent domestic rights, and so the Regulations applied not only to EU-derived holiday pay rights but to all deductions from wages claims. But this was, in the judge's opinion, an inappropriate use of the ECA, and only new primary legislation could limit the exercise of domestic law rights in this way.

It seems inevitable that this point will be appealed, with the judge accepting that "my conclusion in that regard will be challenged and may be wrong." However, if upheld by the higher courts, the decision could re-ignite holiday pay claims that were thought to have been limited for the last 10 years.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.

© Copyright 2025. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More