ARTICLE
25 November 2014

New EU Data Protection Laws 'A Headache' For UK Charities, Lawyer Warns

WB
Wedlake Bell

Contributor

Wedlake Bell logo
We are a contemporary London law firm, rooted in tradition with a lasting legacy of client service. Founded in 1780, we recognise the long-standing relationships we have with our clients and how they have helped shape our past and provide a platform for our future. With 76 partners supported by over 300 lawyers and support staff, we operate on a four practice group model: private client, business services, real estate and dispute resolution. Our driving force is to empower our clients by providing quality legal advice, insight and intelligence that enables them to achieve their goals whether personal or business. We are large enough to advise on the most complex matters, but small enough to ensure that our people and our work remain exceptional and dynamic. Building relationships is at the heart of everything we do.
Mike Gardner says he is telling charity clients they should prepare in advance for new laws, including a requirement for any organisation with more than 250 employees to appoint a data protection officer.
United Kingdom Privacy

Mike Gardner says he is telling charity clients they should prepare in advance for new laws, including a requirement for any organisation with more than 250 employees to appoint a data protection officer.

New EU data protection laws could be a "real headache" for UK charities if implemented in their current form, an intellectual property lawyer has warned.

Mike Gardner, head of intellectual property at the law firm Wedlake Bell, said he was telling charity clients they should prepare for the laws before they come into force, which is expected to happen between March and September next year.

The draft regulation, first proposed in 2012 to update and strengthen the Data Protection Directive, was adopted almost unanimously by the European Parliament in March and is making its way through the EU legislative process.

Gardner cited the proposed obligation for any organisation with more than 250 employees to appoint a data protection officer as an example of how difficult the changes could be for charities, saying it would be an "organisational and administrative nightmare" to comply with this rule alone.

"Unless UK plc voices its concern over the new rules from Brussels, it could mean a real headache for UK businesses and charities," he said. "UK charities must prepare for these changes – doing nothing is not an option."

Asked how an existing charity employee could become a data protection officer, Gardner said that no guidance had been provided on how to achieve this status, simply that the person would need to be "suitably qualified" and understand data protection laws. He said this was an unrealistic ambition, given that only a few hundred lawyers were familiar with this area.

He said the application of this rule to organisations with 250 employees was an arbitrary requirement that took no account of how much personal information an organisation had under its control.

Gardner referred to well-publicised data protection breaches by charities such as the British Pregnancy Advisory Service, which was was fined £200,000 earlier this year after a hacker gained access to the personal details of almost 10,000 people on its website

He said these cases had already had very serious consequences for the sector from both a reputational and a financial perspective. If the new EU laws were implemented in their existing form, he said, charities would face increasing costs and scrutiny and more serious penalties if they got it wrong.

Some of the main proposals are: introducing fines from data protection authorities of up to €1m (£780,000) or 2 per cent of annual worldwide turnover; bringing in a duty to confess, which will mean that charities will need to notify the authorities of a data breach within 24 hours of becoming aware of it and also notify the individuals whose personal data was affected; and specifying that any charity holding data on any person would have to gain explicit consent if they wished to use that data in any way.

Originally published by Third Sector.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More