ARTICLE
8 May 2024

UK Takeover Panel Revises Guidance For Private Sale Processes

OC
Osborne Clarke

Contributor

Osborne Clarke is an international legal practice with over 340 Partners and more than 1300 lawyers in 26 locations*. We give legal advice that is greater than the sum of its parts, combining legal expertise with sector and client understanding alongside insight into the global issues driving transformation. We’ll help you tackle the challenges you’re facing today and tomorrow. *Services in India are provided by a relationship firm
The Takeover Panel has announced amendments to Practice Statement 31, which provides guidance on formal sale processes, private sale processes, strategic reviews and public searches for potential offerors.
United Kingdom Corporate/Commercial Law

The Takeover Panel has announced amendments to Practice Statement 31, which provides guidance on formal sale processes, private sale processes, strategic reviews and public searches for potential offerors.

No need to identify potential offerors

The changes introduce a new practice for public companies conducting private sale processes. Under this, companies will no longer have to identify potential offerors unless they have been specifically linked to relevant rumours or speculation.

Provided such potential offerors remain undisclosed, this will also negate the need to include the offer price and a "put up or shut up" deadline in the leak announcement. These changes aim to strike a balance between disclosure requirements and maintaining confidentiality during negotiations.

Clearer guidance

Practice Statement 31 has also undergone a review and restructuring, offering more detailed information on different sale processes and the Takeover Panel's approach to the UK's City Code on Takeovers and Mergers in each case. These updates will provide companies with clearer guidance when navigating the provisions of the Code.

Osborne Clarke comment

Hot on the heels of the consultation announced on Wednesday 24 April 2024, these amendments to Practice Statement 31 are another welcome change to the Code, particularly in situations where some potential offerors may be sensitive about having to be prematurely identified in the event of a leak and which otherwise may have led them to withdraw from the process.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More