ARTICLE
29 April 2021

Corporates Are Making Increasing Use Of Litigation Funders To Help Them Finance Legal Proceedings

RR
Rahman Ravelli Solicitors

Contributor

Rahman Ravelli is known for its sophisticated, bespoke and robust representation of corporates, senior business executives and professionals in national and international matters.
It is one of the fastest-growing and most highly-regarded, market-leading legal practices in its field. This is due to its achievements in criminal and regulatory investigations and large-scale commercial disputes involving corporate wrongdoing and multi-jurisdictional enforcement, and its asset recovery, internal investigations and compliance expertise.
The firm’s global reach, experienced litigators and network of trusted partner firms ensure it can address legal matters for clients anywhere in the world. It combines astute business intelligence and shrewd legal expertise with proactive, creative strategies to secure the best possible outcome for all its clients.
Rahman Ravelli’s achievements in certain cases have even helped shape the law. It is regularly engaged by other law firms to provide independent advice.

Syed Rahman, of commercial litigation experts Rahman Ravelli, considers the potential benefits of this approach.
United Kingdom Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Syed Rahman, of commercial litigation experts Rahman Ravelli, considers the potential benefits of this approach.

As legal disputes can be lengthy, complex and costly, some companies have struggled to finance their claims. Faced with defendants who may be wealthy and well represented, many are also reluctant to commit to such action as there is no guarantee of victory.

But many companies, including those with strong finances, are now seeing the benefits of using litigation funding. Seeking someone to fund a company's litigation involves the company then sharing the proceeds of any successful litigation with the funder. But this approach enables some of the company's funds that would otherwise be tied up in the litigation to be used for other purposes.

Issues such as whether the company itself or the litigation funder instruct the legal representatives and how the amount paid in settlement of the case is shared between the two need to be addressed when the terms of the funding arrangement are agreed. In many cases, the funder is likely to leave the company to instruct legal counsel, although they will have been briefed about the facts and legal issues relating to the case.

To prevent any later fallings out, the funding agreement between the two parties can include an amount that they will accept from the defendant if and when it is offered. This is usually agreed between company and funder after considering the amount required to fund the litigation, the likely length of it and the type of litigation being brought. How any conflicts of interest between company and funder would be resolved should also be included in the funding agreement.

Such agreements should not be rushed into by either side. But there is little doubt that a well-constructed litigation funding agreement can bring benefits for both sides. The company can keep money that would otherwise be tied up in the case free for other purposes, while the funder that is brought on board can view the arrangement as an investment that can prove to be financially rewarding.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More