ARTICLE
9 October 2012

Private Insurance Market Referred By OFT To Competition Commission

CC
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang

Contributor

CMS is a Future Facing firm with 79 offices in over 40 countries and more than 5,000 lawyers globally. Combining local market insight with a global perspective, CMS provides business-focused advice to help clients navigate change confidently. The firm's expertise and innovative approach anticipate challenges and develop solutions. CMS is committed to diversity, inclusivity, and corporate social responsibility, fostering a supportive culture. The firm addresses key client concerns like efficiency and regulatory challenges through services like Law-Now, offering real-time eAlerts, mobile access, an extensive legal archive, specialist zones, and global events.

On 28 September 2012 the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) announced its decision to make a market investigation reference (MIR) to the Competition Commission with regard to the supply or acquisition of private motor insurance and related goods and services in the UK.
United Kingdom Antitrust/Competition Law

On 28 September 2012 the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) announced its decision to make a market investigation reference (MIR) to the Competition Commission with regard to the supply or acquisition of private motor insurance and related goods and services in the UK.

The investigation history

The reference stems from a market study launched by the OFT in December 2011, following receipt of information in response to a call for evidence issued in September 2011 and prompted by reports that comprehensive car insurance premiums had risen by 40% between 2010 and 2011.  At the time the OFT found reasonable grounds for suspecting that there were features of the market, specifically in relation to third-party vehicle repairs and credit hire replacement vehicles, which were restricting and/or distorting competition, thereby increasing costs across the market (see OFT press release)

The market study was concluded at the end of May 2012 with the publication by the OFT of the results and a provisional decision to make a MIR to the Competition Commission. At the same time, the OFT opened a further consultation on the proposed MIR, inviting representations by 6 July 2012 (see our previous Law-Now article)

The September Decision

According to the OFT, the consultation did not reveal any new evidence which could lead it to change its view on the market's shortcomings and on the advisability of a reference to the Competition Commission.

The two features of the market that the OFT suspects of preventing, restricting or distorting competition remain:

  • the apparent inability of insurers of at-fault drivers to exercise choice over how repairs and replacement vehicle services are provided and to assess the reasonableness of their cost
  • the carrying out of practices by insurers of not-at-fault drivers, brokers, credit vehicle hire providers, credit repairers and other related services providers which allow them to generate revenues through referral fees or rebates, while simultaneously increasing the costs that the insurer of the at-fault driver has to meet.

These are, in the OFT's view, likely to result in higher costs being passed on to consumers and the OFT still sees a reference as the best course of action, particularly in the light of:

  • the lack of alternative powers – neither enforcement action, nor recommendations would provide a means to a sufficient and comprehensive solution
  • the scale of the suspected problem – the market is estimated to be worth £9.4billion in 2010 and a conservative estimate indicates that consumers could be paying an extra £10 per policy – and the fact that without intervention, the problems are likely to persist
  • no readily implementable remedies – a comprehensive solution which applies to all market participants needs to be identified and the Competition Commission would be best placed to do so, due to the complexity of the competition issues and the large number of market participants.

The full text of the OFT decision, including detailed terms of reference, is available here.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 01/10/2012.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More