ARTICLE
8 August 2019

Real Estate Tip Of The Week: Corporate Housekeeping And SPVs – Avoiding Obvious Traps

DB
DAC Beachcroft LLP

Contributor

DAC Beachcroft’s purpose is to drive success for clients and colleagues by creating sustainable value. Their vision is to become leading business advisers, recognized for their insights and commitment to clients, while being a desirable workplace for talented individuals. The firm's cultural principles emphasize a supportive, creative, determined, and clear work environment. They prioritize inclusivity, respect, and teamwork, fostering an open, collaborative atmosphere for generating innovative solutions. With a focus on integrity, quality, and transparency, the firm empowers its people to excel and deliver the best outcomes for clients, colleagues, and the broader community.

In a recent case at the High Court a specific purchase vehicle (i.e. an "SPV") had been struck off the register of companies after it failed to properly notify Companies House of its new address
United Kingdom Corporate/Commercial Law

Failure to comply with the filing requirements of Companies House can inadvertently cause havoc in property transactions.

In a recent case at the High Court a specific purchase vehicle (i.e. an "SPV") had been struck off the register of companies after it failed to properly notify Companies House of its new address. This triggered insolvency obligations in a purchase contract, giving the seller a contractual right to terminate the arrangement. When the seller exercised this right of termination, the SPV argued that the seller could not do so as the SPV had since been restored on the register of companies (having then properly filed its necessary paperwork).

The High Court held that the subsequent restoration of the SPV at Companies House could not save it from the provisions of the contract: an exercisable right of termination had clearly arisen and the sale contract had therefore been properly terminated by the seller.

Buyers and sellers of commercial property should therefore diligently comply with all corporate housekeeping obligations in order to avoid such unfortunate circumstances. Furthermore, sellers should ensure that any sale contract with an SPV contains adequate insolvency provisions and otherwise properly deals with the risk that the SPV will default on its obligations, typically via the provision of a suitable deposit or a parent company guarantee. Sellers should have the same concerns where any purchaser has a low covenant strength.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More