ARTICLE
5 August 2021

The Supreme Court Changes Its Precedent Regarding Non-Compete Agreements

EA
Esin Attorney Partnership

Contributor

Esin Attorney Partnership, a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International, has long been a leading provider of legal services in the Turkish market. We have a total of nearly 140 staff, including over 90 lawyers, serving some of the largest Turkish and multinational corporations. Our clients benefit from on-the-ground assistance that reflects a deep understanding of the country's legal, regulatory and commercial practices, while also having access to the full-service, international and foreign law advice of the world's leading global law firm. We help our clients capture and optimize opportunities in Turkey's dynamic market, including the key growth areas of mergers and acquisitions, infrastructure development, private equity and real estate. In addition, we are one of the few firms that can offer services in areas such as compliance, tax, employment, and competition law — vital for companies doing business in Turkey.
The 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court ("9th Civil Chamber"), with its decision numbered 2021/3076 E. and 2021/9789 K., ruled that the labor courts are the competent courts for lawsuits...
Turkey Employment and HR

Recent Development

The 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court ("9th Civil Chamber"), with its decision numbered 2021/3076 E. and 2021/9789 K., ruled that the labor courts are the competent courts for lawsuits regarding the penalty and compensation that might be demanded due to violations of post-employment non-competition obligations. The 9th Civil Chamber has thus changed its settled precedent on this subject.

What does the Supreme Court Decision Say?

Although the Turkish Commercial Code (No. 6102) states that lawsuits related to post-employment non-competition obligations are commercial lawsuits, the 9th Civil Chamber stated that Article 5 of the Turkish Commercial Code reserves anomalistic regulations in this respect. This article reads as "Unless otherwise regulated, commercial courts of first instance are the competent courts with respect to all commercial cases and non-contentious commercial matters."

The 9th Civil Chamber expressed that the Labor Courts Code (No. 7036), which is a special code, was issued to ensure that employees receive their rights more easily. The 9th Civil Chamber also emphasized that Article 5 of the Labor Courts Code states that labor courts are competent to resolve contractual disputes arising between the employer and the employee due to the employment relationship. The 9th Civil Chamber indicated that this provision in the Labor Courts Code reflects the phrase "unless otherwise agreed" in Article 5 of the Turkish Commercial Code.

As a result, the 9th Civil Chamber ruled that lawsuits regarding penalty and compensation requests due to violations of a post-employment non-competition agreement are disputes arising from employment agreements; therefore, a different approach needs to be adopted with respect to its previous decisions, where it had ruled that such lawsuits are commercial lawsuits and that labor courts are the competent courts.

Conclusion

Although it was stated in the previous decisions of the 9th Civil Chamber that penalty and compensation lawsuits related to post-employment non-competition agreements are commercial lawsuits, the 9th Civil Chamber adopted a different approach with respect to these decisions, ruling that labor courts are the competent courts. We recommend that employers closely monitor the decisions that the 9th Civil Chamber will issue on this subject after this precedent change.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More