ARTICLE
31 January 2022

The Concept Of Joint Data Controller In Turkish Legislation

PB
Pekin Bayar Mizrahi

Contributor

Pekin Bayar Mizrahi is a leading top-tier law firm located in Istanbul, Türkiye.

The firm was founded by Mr. Fethi Pekin, who was a former judge, in 1946. Ms. Sefika Pekin and Ms. Selin Bayar subsequently joined the firm. In time, the firm has broadened its areas of expertise and the sectors it advises; thereby becoming a “full-service” firm with a global reach. In 2021, its dispute resolution partner, Mr. Ergin Mizrahi, became a name partner and the firm changed its corporate name as Pekin Bayar Mizrahi.

With its local and international experience of 75 years, Pekin Bayar Mizrahi is now one of the largest law firms in Türkiye in both size and volume, employing around 60 fee earners. The firm also has liaison offices and affiliate counsels in numerous cities in Türkiye. The firm has international practice and its clients include States, large financial institutions, and transnational corporations from various sectors.

With the principle decision of the Personal Data Protection Board ("Board") dated 23.12.2021 which was published on 20.01.2022, the definition of joint data controller which was not present in Turkish legislation is put in place.
Turkey Privacy

With the principle decision of the Personal Data Protection Board ("Board") dated 23.12.2021 which was published on 20.01.2022, the definition of joint data controller which was not present in Turkish legislation is put in place.

While pursuant to GDPR a joint controller relationship arises where two or more controllers jointly determine the purposes and means of processing of personal data, Personal Data Protection Law or the secondary legislation did not include this concept. During the evaluation of a complaint with respect to the black list programs of vehicle leasing companies, the Board defined the joint data controller for the first time.

With this respect, while the leasing company that collects the personal data from customers is deemed as data controller, considering that other leasing companies which use blacklist programs can access and have control on the collected personal data, other leasing companies and software company which use the black list records for their own agenda are also deemed joint data controllers.

The Board also took another step and ruled that while determining the liability and fault with respect to data controllers, a case by case basis evaluation should be made. Accordingly, it is ruled that the criteria such as who the initial and last user of the data is, who made the entry of the personal data, the purpose of such entry, who decides the alteration or deletion or transmission of personal data, and the activities conducted by the other data controllers with such data should be taken into account.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More