ARTICLE
2 September 2025

You Won Your Case. Now What?

BI
Barnard Inc.

Contributor

Barnard Inc is a full-service commercial law firm, with services covering corporate and compliance, intellectual property, construction, mining and engineering, property, fiduciary services commercial litigation, M&A, restructuring, insurance, and family law. Our attorneys advise listed and private companies, individuals, and local and foreign organisations across South Africa, Africa and internationally.
The day you win is rarely the day anything moves. A judge signs an order; your inbox fills with congratulations; and the person who lost simply… goes quiet
South Africa Corporate/Commercial Law
Bradley Wright’s articles from Barnard Inc. are most popular:
  • within Corporate/Commercial Law topic(s)
Barnard Inc. are most popular:
  • within Tax, Consumer Protection and Finance and Banking topic(s)

Turning a court order into results when the other side disappears

The day you win is rarely the day anything moves. A judge signs an order; your inbox fills with congratulations; and the person who lost simply... goes quiet. Phones ring out. Addresses turn out to be "last known". Promises to comply melt into new excuses. If your order requires a specific act – hand over a vehicle, open premises for inspection, remove equipment – silence is not just frustrating; it erodes the value of the judgment.

Enforcement is its own discipline. It blends law, logistics and, often, a bit of detective work. Here's how it works in practice when a paper victory needs to become a physical outcome, using a common scenario as a guide: a restoration shop won't return a client's classic car, and the client lives overseas.

The first rule: Make the order enforceable

Some orders are easy to execute: "pay R X" can run straight to a warrant of execution. Others need translation into steps a sheriff can perform. If the order says "return the vehicle within five days," it should also authorise the sheriff to enter, attach and deliver if the deadline passes, and direct the South African Police Service to assist if necessary. Clear wording avoids a second trip to court when the workshop simply locks the roller door.

Service and knowledge: the hinge for contempt

Civil contempt is the engine that powers compliance with 'do this' orders. Courts don't imprison people for misunderstanding paperwork; they punish wilful, bad-faith disobedience of an order they know about. That means you must prove either personal service of the order on the debtor, or reliable evidence that they had actual knowledge of it. Evasion is common – front offices turn process servers away; cellphones go dark.

When that happens, the law gives you alternatives. The courts have recently authorise substituted service which may entail service by e-mail, WhatsApp or even social media where you can show the account is used and messages are being read. The point is not to play "gotcha"; it's to demonstrate to the court, later, that the debtor knew and chose not to comply.

Tracing and evidence: Build the factual spine

While you arrange service, trace the asset and the person. Workshop Google listings, Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) records, geo-tagged photos on social media, supplier invoices, and delivery notes often put the vehicle or the decision-maker at a specific place and time. Sheriffs act faster when you can say, "unit 7, black roller door; VIN visible through window; security on site Tuesdays to Thursdays." Keep a clean log of calls, visits and sightings. Contempt applications are won on timelines as much as on principle.

Sheriff first, contempt later

If the order already authorises the sheriff, instruct them immediately with certified copies of the order and clear directions. Sheriffs know their precincts; they will try at business hours, early mornings, even weekends, and they will log each attempt. If access is refused or the asset is concealed, their return of service becomes pivotal proof for the next step.

Contempt is not the opening move; it is the consequence of a pattern: a valid order, proper service or clear knowledge, a reasonable deadline, no compliance. When you reach that point, the court considers whether the non-compliance is wilful and mala fide. If so, it may issue a suspended sentence (comply by a new date or face jail), a fine, or, where appropriate, committal. Often the mere service of a contempt application breaks the stalemate; people who ignored the sheriff respond quickly to a when they are collected by a sheriff and/or the South Africa Police Service.

When money – not delivery – is the problem

For money judgments, the tools are different. You can attach movables (office equipment, stock), debts owed to the debtor (for example, funds in a bank account), and, in the Magistrates' Courts, emoluments (a portion of salary) if the debtor is employed. The sheriff's inventory becomes leverage for settlement; auctions are slow and rarely recover full value, so many debtors pay when removal is imminent.

Cross-border realities

If your client is outside South Africa, an additional application for transfer of judgment to the new jurisdiction and factor in documents they must sign (for example, a special power of attorney), notarisation and apostilles. If the debtor or the asset leaves the province – or the country – enforcement becomes a game of jurisdictions. South African orders can be enforced elsewhere, but only after recognition procedures in that country. Move quickly before the trail grows cold.

Safety and chain of custody

Recovering a vehicle or equipment is not a movie scene; it's a controlled operation. Sheriffs are trained, but they are not locksmiths or mechanics. You may need a flatbed, a locksmith, or a specialist to make the asset mobile without causing damage. Build those logistics into your instruction and cost estimate. Photograph everything; record VINs, mileage and condition. Your insurer, and a future court, will care about chain of custody.

Common traps to avoid

  • "Vague orders. "Return the car" with no timeline, address or sheriff clause invites argument. Tight drafting upfront saves months.
  • "Skipping service formalities. "They know" is not a strategy; it's an evidential hole. Get the affidavits and personal service.
  • "Letting weeks pass. The longer non-compliance goes unchallenged, the more normal it feels to the other side and the harder it is to justify urgency later.
  • "Turning everything into contempt. Use the sheriff for mechanical steps first. Save contempt for deliberate defiance.
  • "Fighting the wrong battle. If the real obstacle is a disputed repair bill, consider paying into trust against delivery, and litigate the money later. Possession is often the priority.

In a smooth enforcement, four things align: a workable order, provable service, clear instructions to the sheriff, and a contempt application on standby. Add a practical plan for logistics (transport, storage, security) and an agreed communication script with the debtor's attorney. Most stalemates break at the point where the debtor realises the next document they receive will be a contempt application, not another polite reminder.

When the asset is back or the money is paid, close the loop. Obtain a sheriff's return confirming execution, settle storage and transport accounts, and, where appropriate, file a short compliance affidavit if the court expects feedback. If you incurred enforcement costs the court allowed, add them to your bill of costs. Then harden your contracts for next time: clearer retention-of-title clauses, better exit terms, updated addresses for service, and a dispute-resolution ladder that moves problems to a neutral quickly.

Paper wins are not enough. Enforcement is where law meets logistics and where clarity meets persistence. If you plan for service, equip the sheriff, and keep contempt as a credible next step, not an empty threat, your judgment will do the one thing judgments are meant to do: change behaviour in the real world.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More