ARTICLE
28 October 2025

Reforming Arbitration In The Kingdom: Saudi Arabia's Push Toward Global Standards

HM
Habib Al Mulla and Partners

Contributor

Founded in 1984, Habib Al Mulla & Partners is one of the UAE’s most respected law firms, with offices in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Istanbul, Baghdad, Moscow, Cairo and New Delhi. Our 50+ multi-disciplinary lawyers are recognised for excellence in dispute resolution, cross-border advisory, and regulatory matters. The firm has played a leading role in shaping the UAE’s modern legal landscape, including drafting legislation and creating the legal framework for the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC). We combine deep regional insight with international expertise to serve clients across diverse industries.
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is poised to transform its arbitration landscape with the recently draft Arbitration Law ("Draft Law"), published by the National Competitiveness Center for public consultations.
Saudi Arabia Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Habib Al Mulla and Partners are most popular:
  • within Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration, Employment and HR and Technology topic(s)

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is poised to transform its arbitration landscape with the recently draft Arbitration Law ("Draft Law"), published by the National Competitiveness Center for public consultations.

The Draft Law presents significant opportunity for the Kingdom to take a huge step forward towards modernizing the dispute-resolution framework and aligning more closely with international standards, such as the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration.

While the Draft Law represents a clear departure from the old law, with the changes it proposes, we have highlighted some of the key enhancements below:

  1. Governing Law of the Arbitration Agreement
    The Draft Law introduces an express rule that the law governing an arbitration agreement will be either the law chosen by the parties or, in the absence of such choice, the law of the seat of arbitration. This change brings greater clarity and predictability for parties and reflects best practice drafting in jurisdictions such as England and Wales.

  2. Arbitrator Eligibility and Immunity
    The Draft Law introduces an express rule that the law governing an arbitration agreement will be either the law chosen by the parties or, in the absence of such choice, the law of the seat of arbitration. This change brings greater clarity and predictability for parties and reflects best practice drafting in jurisdictions such as England and Wales.

  3. Joinder and Consolidation Mechanisms
    The Draft Law introduces clear provisions for joinder and consolidation in multi-party or multi-contract disputes: an intervening party may be joined if it is a party to the arbitration agreement, and the parties may agree to the consolidation of proceedings. These features enhance procedural flexibility, particularly for complex arbitrations (for example in construction or infrastructure sectors).

  4. Interim Measures: Enforcement and Recognition
    A comprehensive chapter on interim relief is included in the Draft Law. The tribunal is empowered to order interim measures under a regime modelled on the UNCITRAL standard, and local courts may enforce such interim orders within a statutory period of 15 days. This enhances the speed and enforceability of urgent relief in arbitration proceedings.

  5. Emergency, Partial and Interim Awards, and Technological Modernization
    The Draft Law expressly recognizes emergency awards, partial awards and interim awards as binding decisions of the arbitral tribunal. It also allows for electronic signing of awards (including by arbitrators sitting outside the Kingdom), treats awards as rendered at the seat of arbitration, permits virtual hearings and electronic communications (email/mobile notifications), and allows service by electronic means. These provisions reflect a modern, technology-friendly arbitration regime.

  6. Annulment and Enforcement: Res Judicata Effect
    The Draft Law refines the annulment (set-aside) and enforcement regime by introducing a 60-day period during which the tribunal may remedy formal defects in an award (without altering its substance), prior to set-aside proceedings. On enforcement, the Draft Law allows appeal of enforcement orders up to the Supreme Court and creates a res judicata effect for awards irrespective of the country of issuance. These changes aim to reduce procedural risk, enhance finality and strengthen predictability for parties seeking enforcement in or from Saudi Arabia.

In a nutshell,

The Draft Law – if enacted post consultation – will play a major role in reducing risks, increasing efficiency, and strengthening the Kingdom's credentials as an arbitration-friendly jurisdiction. Such reforms underscore the Kingdom's ambition to position itself as a regional hub for international dispute resolution.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More