ARTICLE
16 September 2024

Zhongshan Fucheng Ind. Inv. Co. Ltd v. Nigeria: The Interplay Between Preservative Orders And Sovereign Immunity In The Seizure Of Nigeria's Presidential Jets

TA
Tope Adebayo LP

Contributor

Established in 2008, Tope Adebayo LP offers holistic solutions in energy, disputes, and corporate transactions. Our diverse team crafts bespoke strategies for clients, driving industry wins and growth. We are a one-stop shop, licensed for legal, finance, and corporate services, with a global network for seamless cross-border transactions.
The intersection of pre-enforcement preservative orders and sovereign immunity presents a complex legal conundrum, particularly in cases where State assets are threatened with attachment to satisfy arbitral awards.
Nigeria Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Introduction

The intersection of pre-enforcement preservative orders and sovereign immunity presents a complex legal conundrum, particularly in cases where State assets are threatened with attachment to satisfy arbitral awards. This complexity was starkly illustrated in the recent seizure of Nigeria's presidential jets by Zhongshan Fucheng Industrial Investment Co. Ltd ("Zhongshan"). This Chinese company sought to enforce an arbitral award of approximately $70 million against the Federal Republic of Nigeria ("Nigeria"), stemming from a dispute with the Ogun State Government. Apparently, Zhongshan seems to have adopted the concept of attribution in international investment arbitration to hold Nigeria accountable for the actions of one of its states – Ogun State – which we addressed in our maiden article on this case, published on 26th August 2024.

Building on the foundation of our maiden article, this article explores the complexities of enforcing such pre-enforcement preservative orders, commonly known as freezing orders, against sovereign assets, examining whether Nigeria's presidential jet constitutes a sovereign or commercial asset and how sovereign immunity may—or may not—shield it from attachment or seizure.

The Legal Terrain of Pre-Enforcement Freezing Orders

Pre-enforcement freezing orders are legal mechanisms designed to preserve assets from being dissipated before a judgment or arbitral award can be enforced. In international arbitration, such orders are often sought to ensure that the party at a disadvantage does not render itself judgment-proof by transferring or concealing assets. However, when the assets in question belong to a sovereign state, the doctrine of sovereign immunity poses significant challenges.

To read the full article, kindly download the PDF

To view original Tope Adebayo article, please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More