ARTICLE
30 April 2018

Interim liquidation order made on Pickwick basis

WW
Wynn Williams Lawyers

Contributor

Wynn Williams is a renowned law firm in New Zealand, offering a full range of legal services with a team of skilled lawyers. Established in 1859, the firm is known for its expertise, straightforward advice, and strong client relationships. Recognized in prestigious legal directories, Wynn Williams is proud of its heritage and commitment to honest, experienced guidance for clients. Offices are located in Auckland, Christchurch, and Queenstown.
The respondent to the ex parte application was invited to appear without the need to file written submissions.
New Zealand Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Reserve Bank of New Zealand v CBL Insurance Limited [2018] NZHC 264

This decision is notable for the fact that the hearing involved proceeding on a Pickwick basis – a practice whereby the respondent to an ex parte application is invited to appear at the hearing without the need to file written submissions.

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ), the designated prudential supervisor of insurers, successfully obtained an order to have an interim liquidator appointed for CBL Insurance Limited (CBLI), pending the outcome of substantive liquidation proceedings. The affidavit filed in support of the application recorded RBNZ's view that CBLI had breached the 100% solvency margin required to be maintained by it under the Insurance (Prudential Supervision) Act 2010, along with statutory directions made by RBNZ in respect of payments made to overseas recipients.

The application was heard by Courtney J on a Pickwick basis, with counsel for RBNZ attending by telephone and filing a memorandum and affidavit in support, and counsel for CBIL attending in person. Her Honour remarked that counsel for CBIL had been given an appropriate opportunity to respond, within the constraints of the Pickwick process, and that she was satisfied the statutory criteria for an interim order had been met. An appointment of interim liquidators was, therefore, the proper course to take.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More