Luxembourg: Court Procedure

Subscribe
Litigation law, mediation law, and arbitrage law thought leadership, articles, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering civil law, class actions, dispute resolution, libel and defamation and more in relation to litigation, mediation and arbitration.
Article
Court Of Appeal, August 31, 2026, Order, UPC_CoA_312/2025
The Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court addresses the procedural requirements for obtaining suspensive effect when filing an application for rehearing under Article 81(2) UPCA. The decision clarifies that suspensive effect is not automatic and requires independent substantiation beyond the grounds for rehearing itself, with applicants needing to demonstrate concrete, irreparable prejudice to justify departure from the default rule of continued enforceability.
Luxembourg IP
BP
Bardehle Pagenberg
Article
CoA, August 5, 2026, Order On An Application For Suspensive Effect, UPC_CoA_118/2026, UPC_CoA_119/2026, UPC_CoA_120/2026
The Court of Appeal in Luxembourg addresses critical procedural questions regarding the suspension of first-instance proceedings during appeals of preliminary objection rejections under the Unified Patent Court Agreement. The decision examines whether exceptional circumstances warrant staying proceedings and clarifies the court's authority to conditionally add interveners as parties to ensure counterclaim admissibility.
Luxembourg Litigation
BP
Bardehle Pagenberg
Article
CoA, July 10, 2026, Request For A Discretionary Review, UPC_CoA_95/2026
The Court of Appeal examines a request for discretionary review in a patent dispute between Adobe Inc., Adobe Systems Software Ireland Limited, and KEEEX SAS concerning European Patent EP 2 949 070. This procedural matter involves multiple rules of procedure including provisions on discretionary review, case management, and appellate processes within the Unified Patent Court framework.
Luxembourg Litigation
BP
Bardehle Pagenberg