ARTICLE
21 October 2015

Irish High Court Quashes Irish Data Protection Commission Original Schrems' Decision

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private equity, sustainable energy, and technology. The world’s most innovative companies trust Mintz to provide expert advice, protect and monetize their IP, negotiate deals, source financing, and solve complex legal challenges. The firm has over 600 attorneys across offices in Boston, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, Washington, DC, San Francisco, San Diego, and Toronto.
The Irish High Court today has ordered the Irish Data Protection Commissioner (DPC) to investigate Facebook's European data privacy practices, bringing Max Schrems' three-year fight full circle.
Ireland Privacy

The Irish High Court today has ordered the Irish Data Protection Commissioner (DPC) to investigate Facebook's European data privacy practices, bringing Max Schrems' three-year fight full circle. The Court today quashed the original DPC refusal to examine Schrems' complaint that came back to the High Court after the referral to the European Court of Justice (CJEU).

Ireland's DPC, Helen Dixon, refused to investigate the original Schrems' complaint based on the validity of the US-EU Safe Harbor Framework. By now, we all know what happened to Safe Harbor when it reached the CJEU.

Today's High Court decision awards Schrems costs for his legal bills and travel expenses and Judge Gerard Hogan commented that "the commissioner is obliged now to investigate the complaint ... and I've absolutely no doubt that she will proceed to do so."

The EU's Article 29 Working Party of EU data protection officials issued a joint statement last week forthrightly expressing its position post-CJEU decision:

Regarding the practical consequences of the CJEU judgment, the Working Party considers that it is clear that transfers from the European Union to the United States can no longer be framed on the basis of the European Commission adequacy decision 2000/520/EC (the so-called "Safe Harbour decision"). In any case, transfers that are still taking place under the Safe Harbour decision after the CJEU judgment are unlawful.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More