ARTICLE
9 October 2015

The Whistleblowers Protection (Amendment) Bill, 2015

SC
Solomon & Co.

Contributor

Solomon & Co. is a full-service law firm headquartered in Mumbai, the financial and commercial capital of India, with offices in Mumbai and Pune. Founded in 1909, the firm is ranked amongst the most reputed law firms in the country.

The firm provides high-value legal services across a broad range of practice areas, including Corporate, Mergers and Acquisitions, Business and Trade, Banking and Finance, Capital Markets, India entry, Private Equity, Dispute Resolution, Real Estate and Construction, Insurance and Intellectual Property. Since its inception, Solomon & Co. has been advising Indian and international companies, government organizations and individuals on their most challenging transactions. Our clients range from global banks, investment funds and high net-worth individuals to not-for-profit organizations. Solomon & Co. is a member of Alliott Global Alliance in Mumbai, Pune and Goa.

Views are being expressed that the Bill is being used to dilute the effect of the Act.
India Employment and HR

On 13 May 2015, the Lok Sabha (the lower house of India's bicameral Parliament) passed a Bill to amend the Whistleblowers Protection Act 2011 (passed by Parliament in 2014), amid resistance from the Opposition. The Bill will now be placed before the Rajya Sabha (the upper house).
Views are being expressed that the Bill is being used to dilute the effect of the Act. The Act states that any person, including a public servant or an NGO, may make a public interest disclosure before a Competent Authority. This would apply, irrespective of the provisions of the Official Secrets Act, 1923.
Section 8 of the Act provided that certain matters were exempt from disclosure, such as:
information likely to prejudicially affect the interest of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign states, public order, decency or morality or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence-

  1. as might involve the disclosure of proceedings of the Cabinet of the Union Government or any Committee of the Cabinet;
  2. as might involve the disclosure of proceedings of the Cabinet of the State Government or any Committee of that Cabinet.

The amendment bill adds other grounds on which information is exempt from disclosure, such as:

  1. information relating to commercial confidence, trade secrets or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would harm the competitive position of a third party, unless such information has been disclosed to the complainant under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005;
  2. information which is available to a person in his fiduciary capacity or relationship, unless such information has been disclosed to the complainant under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005;
  3. information, the disclosure of which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or security purposes;
  4. information, which would impede the process of investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders;
  5. personal information, the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual, unless such information has been disclosed to the complainant under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005."

Because of the extension to the circumstances in which information does not have to be disclosed, it is felt that the Amendment is taking away from the effectiveness of the original Act.

Originally published June 2015.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More