LD Munich, 19 February 2024, Order Of The Court Of First Instance, UPC_CFI_9/2023

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.

Explore Firm Details

A videoconference with the parties can be designated a separate hearing under Rule 334(d) RoP, which does not preclude an interim conference under Rule 35(b) RoP.

Germany Intellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

Example of exercise of the case management powers of the court under R. 334 RoP.

A videoconference with the parties can be designated a separate hearing under Rule 334(d) RoP, which does not preclude an interim conference under Rule 35(b) RoP.

2. Division

Local Division Munich

3. UPC number

UPC_CFI_9/2023

4. Type of proceedings

Infringement Action

5. Parties

Claimant: Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd

Defendant: NETGEAR Deutschland GmbH; Netgear Inc.; Netgear International Limited

6. Patent(s)

EP3611989

7. Body of legislation / Rules

R. 336 RoP; R. 334 RoP, R. 105 RoP

To view the full article, click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.