ARTICLE
26 October 2020

Investing In German Companies As A Foreign Investor

MB
Mayer Brown

Contributor

Mayer Brown is a distinctively global law firm, uniquely positioned to advise the world’s leading companies and financial institutions on their most complex deals and disputes. We have deep experience in high-stakes litigation and complex transactions across industry sectors, including our signature strength, the global financial services industry.
Whilst foreign direct investments ("FDI") in German companies have been subject to a screening regime for a long time, over the last few years the FDI regime in Germany has constantly...
Germany Government, Public Sector

I. Introduction

1. German FDI Screening Regime in M&A Transactions

Whilst foreign direct investments ("FDI") in German companies have been subject to a screening regime for a long time, over the last few years the FDI regime in Germany has constantly become tighter and more M&A transactions are subject to review and the authorities take a closer look at those transactions. In 2018, for the first time in Germany, a transaction targeting a mid-size German metal spinning company was to be blocked under the FDI regime (although the deal was cancelled before this happened). The Covid-19 pandemic has drawn special attention to the FDI instruments that act to safeguard Germany's medical capabilities; as such, FDI considerations have become an important topic in terms of deal certainty and deal preparation.

Newly introduced "gun-jumping" rules require a thorough assessment to avoid fines and even criminal charges relating to information exchange and closing a deal without the requisite clearance. Since 11 October 2020, the EU FDI Screening Regulation applies, and, on 7 October 2020, the latest amendment to German FDI laws was introduced. Investments from the UK will be treated as FDI upon termination of the transition period for Brexit on 31 December 2020, absent specific arrangements. This white paper gives an overview of the German FDI regime and the key considerations necessary for the smooth navigation of an M&A process.

2. Overview of the German FDI Screening Regime

The German FDI regime differentiates between a (i) sector-specific (see III.1) and (ii) cross-sector (see III.2) review. Whereas the sector-specific review is applicable to transactions in the area of defense and military goods, the cross-sector review is applicable to all (other) transactions. The cross-sector mechanism differentiates between certain key industries, namely so-called "critical infrastructure", software relating to critical infrastructure, and certain further listed industries ("Key Industries"), and all other industries, and provides for tighter rules in respect of transactions in Key Industries. The German Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie; "German Ministry") is the competent authority for the FDI review and coordinates the process with other German and European authorities. The FDI screening regime in Germany is governed by the Foreign Trade and Payments Act (Außenwirtschaftsgesetz; "FTPA") and the Foreign Trade and Payments Ordinance (Außenwirtschaftsverordnung; "FTPO") and, from EU level, by Regulation (EU) 2019/452 to establish a Framework for the Screening of Foreign Direct Investment in the Union ("EU FDI Screening Regulation") (see II.). These rules require certain steps to be taken pre- and post-signing to ensure a successful closing (see IV.).

Investments from the UK will be treated as FDI upon termination of the transition period for Brexit on 31 December 2020, absent specific arrangements.

II. EU Coordination Mechanism for FDI Screening

The purpose of the EU FDI Screening Regulation is not to create an overarching European investment control mechanism and not to transfer the corresponding decision-making power to the European Commission, as the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States ("CFIUS") is equipped with in the United States. The ultimate decision remains with the Member State whose FDI regime applies (this can be more than one Member State for the same transaction). It imposes a coordination mechanism on all Member States that have an FDI screening regime, but it does not itself impose a screening mechanism on a Member State. Currently, 16 Member States have national screening regimes for FDI1. If a Member State has an FDI screening regime, it must ensure that it is transparent, non-discriminatory and complies with the common framework set by the EU FDI Screening Regulation. If a transaction affects more than one Member State, the cooperation mechanism of the EU FDI Screening Regulation shall ensure the involvement of the European Commission and of the relevant Member States.

The ultimate decision remains with the Member State whose FDI regime applies.

Footnotes

1 Austria, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Spain and the United Kingdom.

To read the full article click here

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2020. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More