ARTICLE
8 October 2024

General Court Upholds Sanctions Against Russia

WP
WH Partners

Contributor

We are a law firm with a strong focus on assisting businesses fuelling the digital economy and not only in the territories we operate in. We have offices in Malta, Italy, Romania, and we operate Czech, Polish and UAE desks, as well as having a worldwide network of correspondent firms. We have a well-established practice advising clients on (in no particular order) fintech, gaming & gambling, corporate, M&A, tax, dispute resolution, corporate finance, intellectual property, data privacy and personal data processing, consumer protection & advertising, real estate, employment & immigration matters, sports, technology & media, competition & state aid. Our firm and several of our lawyers are highly ranked by Chambers & Partners, Legal 500, IFLR1000 and Who’s Who Legal.
On October 2, 2024, the General Court (a constituent court of the Court of Justice of the European Union) delivered three rulings (Cases T-797/22, T-798/22, and T-828/22)...
Worldwide International Law

On October 2, 2024, the General Court (a constituent court of the Court of Justice of the European Union) delivered three rulings (Cases T-797/22, T-798/22, and T-828/22), affirming the 2022 prohibition on legal services to the Russian Government and entities as necessary and proportionate. The Court ruled that these measures do not breach the right to a fair trial under Article 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.

The sanctions, aimed at pressuring Russia to end its aggression against Ukraine, were upheld as part of the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy. The regulations prohibit Russian entities from receiving legal services from EU-authorised lawyers, with specific exemptions requiring approval.

The applicants argued that the regulations violated the right to a fair trial and privacy, and strained lawyer independence. However, the Court dismissed these claims, emphasising the necessity and proportionality of the measures to prevent Russia from using legal advice to further its aggressive actions. The Court also noted that the prohibition is limited to litigious contexts, leaving commercial and non-litigious matters unaffected.

These rulings underscore the importance of adhering to fundamental freedoms and principles, even in challenging circumstances.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More