ARTICLE
14 March 2016

Rolling Limitation Period Applied To Breach Of Covenant In Lease

BL
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Contributor

BLG is a leading, national, full-service Canadian law firm focusing on business law, commercial litigation, and intellectual property solutions for our clients. BLG is one of the country’s largest law firms with more than 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals in five cities across Canada.
When Does the Limitation Period Run in the Context of a Continuing Breach?
Canada Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

​When Does the Limitation Period Run in the Context of a Continuing Breach?

The Court of Appeal for Ontario recently answered this question in Pickering Square Inc. v. Trillium College Inc.

The facts of this case are simple. Trillium College Inc., the tenant in commercial space in a shopping centre, vacated its premises contrary to the lease which required the tenant to operate its vocational college business continuously throughout the term of the lease. The Court of Appeal held that the motion judge properly concluded that a fresh cause of action occurred every day that breach continued – every day that Trillium failed to carry on its business in the leased premises in accordance with the covenant in the lease. The limitation period in the case of a breach of a continuing obligation applies on a rolling basis. The two-year limitation period commences each day a fresh cause of action accrues and runs two years from that date.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More