ARTICLE
5 October 2013

The International Trademark Association, Represented By Smart & Biggar, Is Granted Leave To Intervene In Proceedings Interpreting Quebec’s French Charter

SB
Smart & Biggar

Contributor

Smart & Biggar uncovers and maximizes intellectual property and technology assets for our clients. Today’s fast-paced innovation economy demands a higher level of expertise and attention to detail when it comes to IP strategy and protection. With over 125 lawyers, patent agents and trademark agents collaborating across five Canadian offices, Smart & Biggar is trusted by the world’s leading innovators to find value in their IP rights. As market leaders in IP, Smart & Biggar’s team is on the pulse when it comes to the latest developments and the wider industry changes that impact our clients. To stay informed, visit smartbiggar.ca/insights, including access to our RxIP Update (smartbiggar.ca/insights/rx-ip-updates), a monthly digest of the latest decisions and law surrounding the life sciences and pharmaceutical industries.
On September 20, 2013, the International Trademark Association ("INTA"), a not-for-profit association of more than 5,900 members consisting of trade-mark owners, trade-mark professionals and academics from more than 190 countries, was granted leave by the Quebec Superior Court to intervene in a declaratory judgment proceeding pertaining to the interplay between the Quebec’s Charter of the French language (the "French Charter") and trade-marks.
Canada Intellectual Property

On September 20, 2013, the International Trademark Association ("INTA"), a not-for-profit association of more than 5,900 members consisting of trade-mark owners, trade-mark professionals and academics from more than 190 countries, was granted leave by the Quebec Superior Court to intervene in a declaratory judgment proceeding pertaining to the interplay between the Quebec's Charter of the French language (the "French Charter") and trade-marks. INTA is represented in this matter by François Guay, Christian Bolduc and Jean-Sébastien Dupont of the Montreal office of Smart & Biggar.

In Quebec, the French Charter requires that public signs and commercial advertising be predominantly in French, while providing an exception for "recognized trade-marks." Until recently, the Office Québécois de la langue française (OQLF), the body in charge of applying and enforcing the French Charter, allowed businesses to use their registered trade-marks, regardless of their language, on signs outside their premises, consistent with the trade-mark exception.

However, in 2011, the OQLF adopted a new policy (without any legislative change) in which it specified that for storefront signs, the law pertaining to trade names would now apply to trade-marks, registered or not. In other words, any trade-mark appearing on a public sign on a building would now be considered to be a trade name use and the trade name rule requiring their translation into French or the addition of French generic language will apply.

In October 2012, seven retailers (Best Buy, Costco, Gap, Old Navy, Guess, Walmart and Toys "R" Us) joined forces and filed a motion for declaratory judgment in the Quebec Superior Court, arguing that the OQLF is misapplying the French Charter and its Regulation by confusing trade name use with trade-mark use and that its current position conflicts with previous policy statements.

INTA, which advocates for the support and advancement of trade-mark law around the world, sought leave to intervene in these proceedings to raise important trade-mark law issues and policies. In particular, it is INTA's position that the OQFL is blurring the line between trade-marks and trade names and that forcing trade-mark owners to add French generic language to their signs puts their trade-mark rights at risk.

The case will be heard on the merits by the Quebec Superior Court on October 21-23, 2013. INTA is represented in this matter by François Guay, Christian Bolduc and Jean-Sébastien Dupont of the Montreal office of Smart & Biggar.

If you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact a member of our firm's Trade-marks group.

The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and technology law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More