ARTICLE
23 October 2013

Exemption From Providing Franchise Disclosure Document

DL
Dale & Lessmann LLP

Contributor

Dale & Lessmann LLP is a full service Canadian business law firm located in Toronto, Ontario. Our legal expertise includes corporate and commercial, mergers and acquisitions, employment, real estate, franchise, cannabis, tax, construction, immigration, infrastructure and renewable energy, intellectual property, bankruptcy and insolvency, wills and estates law and commercial litigation.
Since franchisors are in a position to dictate the terms of franchise agreements, the franchise disclosure document is legally required in order to provide a prospective franchisee with sufficient and readily accessible information to assist them to make informed decisions as to whether to invest in the franchise system or not.
Canada Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Since franchisors are in a position to dictate the terms of franchise agreements, the franchise disclosure document is legally required in order to provide a prospective franchisee with sufficient and readily accessible information to assist them to make informed decisions as to whether to invest in the franchise system or not. 

However, franchise legislation does exempt franchisors in a limited number of circumstances from having to provide a disclosure document to a new franchisee, and, recently, an Ontario court decision helped to clarify the application of one of those exemptions.

According to Ontario franchise legislation, a franchisor does not have to disclose a franchisee on the resale of a franchise between an existing franchisee and a new one where "the grant of the franchise is not effected by or through the franchisor".  In the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in 2189205 Ontario Inc. v. Springdale Pizza Depot Ltd., the court clarified and reinforced the meaning of this exemption by pointing out a number of circumstances (as had occurred between the parties) which, taken together, supported the conclusion that a resale was brought about or caused to happen by or through the franchisor:

  • the franchisor directed the franchisee to the purchaser;
  •  the franchisor negotiated together with the parties to bring about the sale of the business and assignment of the franchise; and
  • the franchisor required the new franchisee to sign documents which the original franchisee had not been required to sign – it did not matter that these documents carried little significance and did not have much bearing on the operation of the franchise

As a result, franchisors who wish to take advantage of this exemption should take special care, on the resale of a franchise, to stay as uninvolved in the transaction as possible.  It is permissible to approve or reject the sale without triggering disclosure obligations, but any more activity than that (including approving the purchase price) may limit the availability of the disclosure exemption.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
23 October 2013

Exemption From Providing Franchise Disclosure Document

Canada Corporate/Commercial Law

Contributor

Dale & Lessmann LLP is a full service Canadian business law firm located in Toronto, Ontario. Our legal expertise includes corporate and commercial, mergers and acquisitions, employment, real estate, franchise, cannabis, tax, construction, immigration, infrastructure and renewable energy, intellectual property, bankruptcy and insolvency, wills and estates law and commercial litigation.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More