On March 20, the CSA issued guidance on holding virtual or hybrid AGMs in light of increasing COVID-19 concerns (the Guidance).
Many companies are considering holding virtual or hybrid meetings in light of current social distancing measures. For a more detailed discussion regarding virtual meetings, see our earlier legal update.
The Guidance provides the following:
If a meeting has already been called and materials sent / posted on SEDAR:
- If a company is changing the date, time or location / format of an in-person AGM, no additional proxy materials are required to be sent to shareholders provided the company promptly: (a) issues a press release announcing the new details; (b) files it on SEDAR; and (c) ensures that reasonable notice of the change is given to market participants, including the company's transfer agent, intermediaries and proxy service providers.
- If the company plans to conduct a virtual AGM (i.e., an AGM conducted through the internet or other electronic means in lieu of an in-person AGM) or hybrid AGM (i.e., an in-person AGM that also permits shareholder participation through electronic means) the company does not need to send additional soliciting materials or update its proxy-related materials solely for the purpose of switching to a virtual or hybrid AGM, if the company follows the steps described above for announcing a change in the AGM date, time or location / format of the meeting.
If a company has not yet sent its AGM materials:
The company should consider including disclosure in its proxy-related materials regarding the possibility of changes to the date, time or location / format of the meeting due to COVID-19.
In all cases, a company planning to conduct a virtual or hybrid AGM, must notify its shareholders and other market participants in a timely manner with clear directions on the logistical details of the virtual or hybrid AGM, including how shareholders can remotely access, participate in, and vote at such AGM.
The Guidance applies to all business transacted at AGMs (including the election of directors and approval or amendments to equity incentive plans). If a company is involved in a proxy contest, holding a special meeting to approve an M&A transaction or seeking approval under Multilateral Instrument 61-101 Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions, it should contact its principal regulator to discuss any additional implications on such meetings.
The Guidance does not address provisions under applicable corporate law or the company's constating documents related to holding virtual AGMs – companies should consult their legal counsel to discuss the implications of same.
About Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
Norton Rose Fulbright is a global law firm. We provide the world's preeminent corporations and financial institutions with a full business law service. We have 3800 lawyers and other legal staff based in more than 50 cities across Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.
Recognized for our industry focus, we are strong across all the key industry sectors: financial institutions; energy; infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and innovation; and life sciences and healthcare.
Wherever we are, we operate in accordance with our global business principles of quality, unity and integrity. We aim to provide the highest possible standard of legal service in each of our offices and to maintain that level of quality at every point of contact.
For more information about Norton Rose Fulbright, see nortonrosefulbright.com/legal-notices.
Law around the world
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.