ARTICLE
24 January 2025

Amendments To Regulation 194 – What You Need To Know About Changes To The Rules Of Civil Procedure

MO
McLeish Orlando LLP

Contributor

McLeish Orlando LLP is a Toronto personal injury law firm representing people who have been seriously injured and family members who have lost a loved one through the negligence of others. McLeish Orlando is a recognized leader within wrongful death and personal injury law. We represent people who have suffered brain injuries, spinal cord injuries and serious orthopaedic injuries. We strive for a fair settlement and the best possible results for our clients.
Regulation 384/24[2] introduced changes to improve the certification of authenticity for authorities cited in factums and expert reports while eliminating duplicate filings.
Canada Ontario Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On December 1, 2024, significant amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure1 came into effect.

Regulation 384/242 introduced changes to improve the certification of authenticity for authorities cited in factums and expert reports while eliminating duplicate filings. Seven rules and one form were amended. This will provide an overview of the main amendments to the seven rules and one form.

Certifying authenticity of authorities cited in factums

Additions to Rule 4.06.1 require factums to include a statement by the filing lawyer, or someone authorized on the lawyer's behalf, to certify the authenticity of all authorities cited in the factum.3 However, authenticity of authorities published by government website, government printers, CanLII, court websites, or commercial publishers is presumed, unless proven otherwise.4

Proof of Service of Notice

Rule 38.06 was amended to remove the requirement to file a copy of a notice of application alongside proof of service for that notice.5 Now, only proof of service of notice of application is required to be filed.

Expert Witnesses

Expert reports are now required to include a certification from the expert witness affirming authenticity of all authorities, documents or records cited, with certain exclusions for evidence provided to the expert, documents cited solely in response to other experts, or those the expert challenges in the report based on the amendments to Rule 53.03.6

Subrule 52.03 was amended to require court-appointed experts to prepare and send a report containing information listed in subrule 53.03(2.1), other than an acknowledgement of an expert's duty, to the registrar.7 The information required in the report are the same as the additions to 53.03 above.

Additionally, authenticity is now presumed for authorities, documents or records published by government websites or printers, scholarly journals, or commercial publishers in the subject area of the report unless evidence suggests otherwise, for expert witnesses and court-appointed experts.8

Harmonize Certification Provisions

Rules 61.11(1) and (5), 61.12(3) and (5.3), and 68.04(3) and (6) were amended to harmonize existing certification provisions for appeal and judicial review factums with the new authenticity requirements.9 These amendments require the appellant's and respondent's factums to include a statement required by subrule 4.06.1(2.1), which was outlined at the start of this blog.

For a complete list of changes, please review Ontario Regulation 384/12 made under the Courts of Justice Act.

Footnotes

1 Rules of Civil procedure, RRO 1990, Reg 194.

2 Ibid as amended by O Reg 384/24, s.1.

3 Ibid, R 4.06.1(2.1).

4 Ibid, R 4.06.1(2.2).

5 Ibid, R 38.06(4).

6 Ibid, R 53.03(2.1).

7 Ibid, R 52.03(7), (7.1).

8 Ibid, R 53.03(2.1.1).

9 Ibid, R 61.11(1), (5), 61.12(3), (5.3), 68.04(3), (6).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More