ARTICLE
30 January 2015

Are you managing an entrenched conflict between co-workers?

CG
Coleman Greig Lawyers

Contributor

Coleman Greig is a leading law firm in Sydney, focusing on empowering clients through legal services and value-adding initiatives. With over 95 years of experience, we cater to a wide range of clients from individuals to multinational enterprises. Our flexible work environment and commitment to innovation ensure the best service for our clients. We integrate with the community and strive for excellence in all aspects of our work.
The FWC ruled that the dismissal was not unfair, because of the interpersonal conflict and the impact it was having.
Australia Employment and HR

In a matter before the Fair Work Commission late last year it ruled that the termination of one of two workers involved in an entrenched workplace conflict was not unfair simply because the employer could have chosen to sack the other employee.

The decision to terminate one of the employees was the result of:

  • there being over a year of problems between the two, who worked in a small office together;
  • their relationship breakdown having a direct impact on the efficiency of the workplace, including their relations with the employer's clients; and
  • the manager's realisation (after over a year) that the conflict was likely to worsen and continue to cause ongoing problems in the workplace.

The Fair Work Commission made a point of clarifying the fact that the reason for the dismissal was not the conduct of the employee that was sacked, but rather the existence of the interpersonal conflict and the impact it was having.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More