ARTICLE
24 October 2012

PPSA and terms of trade: do suppliers need to register a security interest on the PPSR for each supply?

CG
Cooper Grace Ward

Contributor

Established in 1980, Cooper Grace Ward is a leading independent law firm in Brisbane with over 20 partners and 200 team members. They offer a wide range of commercial legal services with a focus on corporate, commercial, property, litigation, insurance, tax, and family law. Their specialized team works across various industries, providing exceptional client service and fostering a strong team culture.
Businesses should review their supply terms and registration strategies or risk loss if their clients become insolvent.
Australia Corporate/Commercial Law

Businesses that supply goods to other entities should revisit their policies about registration on the Personal Properties Securities Register (PPSR) or risk losing their claims to goods if their customers become insolvent.

Many businesses supply goods on terms and conditions that provide for future orders of goods to be made by purchase order and include retention of title clauses. Some liquidators and receivers are taking the view that if businesses supply under these terms:

  • the standard terms, together with each purchase order, form a separate contract on the date of the purchase order or the date the purchase order is accepted by the supplier
  • each contract creates a new security interest
  • therefore goods supplied after 30 January 2012 are not covered by the transitional provisions
  • businesses need to register their interests for each supply in order to protect their interests in those goods
  • if businesses do not register for each supply after 30 January 2012, they are unsecured creditors for those supplies.

The liquidator or receiver then typically offers to settle the supplier's claim for some percentage of the value of the unpaid goods supplied after 30 January 2012.

This is a technical argument that appears to be inconsistent with the legislation's objects and would be cumbersome if in fact it were correct, but until there is some case law, the matter is uncertain. This uncertainty means that suppliers face an undesirable situation of having to either litigate to protect their claims or settle them on a commercial basis.

Until there is case law that clarifies the situation, businesses should review their supply terms and reconsider their registration strategies, particularly for orders of significant value.

Winner - EOWA Employer of Choice for Women Citation 2009, 2010 and 2011
Winner - Australasian Law Awards Gold Employer of Choice 2011
Finalist - ALB Australasian Law Awards 2008, 2010 and 2011 (Best Brisbane Firm)
Winner - BRW Client Choice Awards 2009 and 2010 - Best Australian Law Firm (revenue less than $50m)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More