- within Employment and HR and Privacy topic(s)
- with Finance and Tax Executives and Inhouse Counsel
- with readers working within the Banking & Credit, Business & Consumer Services and Transport industries
When you're injured in a motor vehicle accident in Queensland, understanding recent court decisions can help you evaluate your own claim. The Motor Accident Insurance Act 1994 (Qld) (MAIA) governs how these claims are assessed and what damages you may be entitled to receive.
In 2025, the Queensland Supreme Court handed down several significant judgments that provide important guidance on motor vehicle accident claims, from substantial damages awards to limitation period issues for first responders suffering PTSD.
Multiple Motor Vehicle Accidents: Murphy v Madill [2025] QSC 103
Case Overview
Daniel Joseph Murphy, a 49-year-old solicitor, was involved in two separate motor vehicle accidents that dramatically impacted his life and legal career. The Supreme Court awarded him $635,146.81 in damages after a complex assessment involving multiple injuries and pre-existing psychiatric conditions.
The Accidents
First Accident (10 January 2017): Murphy came upon a fatal pedestrian accident scene where he rendered aid to a fatally injured pedestrian. The trauma of witnessing this accident caused significant psychiatric injury.
Second Accident (28 August 2019): Murphy was involved in a rear-end collision on the Pacific Motorway, resulting in physical injuries including a cervical spine soft tissue injury (4% whole person impairment).
Liability and Assessment
Liability was admitted for both accidents, which meant the court focused entirely on assessing the quantum of damages rather than determining fault. This is a crucial distinction – when liability is admitted, your case can proceed more smoothly to the damages assessment phase.
The complexity in Murphy's case arose from several factors:
- Pre-existing psychiatric conditions (PTSD, Major Depressive Disorder, ASD)
- Determining which injuries were caused by which accident
- Assessing economic loss for a legal professional whose career was impacted
- Psychiatric injuries from witnessing trauma versus physical collision injuries
Damages Breakdown
The total award of $635,146.81 included:
- General damages: $17,150
- Past economic loss: $81,137
- Future economic loss: $331,432
- Interest on past economic loss: $10,228
- Future paid care: $107,738
- Special damages: $46,461
- Future medical expenses and modifications: $41,000
Key Takeaway
Even when you have pre-existing conditions, you can still recover damages for injuries caused or exacerbated by motor vehicle accidents. The court carefully assessed which injuries were causally linked to each accident, demonstrating that having prior health issues doesn't prevent you from making a successful claim.
Young Driver Rear-End Collision: Bauer v Clay [2025] QSC 114
Case Overview
Jack Julian Ronald Bauer was just 22 years old when he was injured in a motor vehicle accident in Bundaberg on 19 March 2022. Despite his young age, the Supreme Court awarded him $602,008.14 in damages for injuries sustained while driving his Subaru WRX on Princess Street.
The Accident and Injuries
Bauer suffered a cervical spine soft tissue injury rated at 13% whole person impairment. Liability was admitted by the defendant, allowing the case to proceed directly to quantum assessment.
The damages award included:
- General damages: $24,370
- Past and future economic loss
- Treatment and care costs
Appeal Discontinued
Interestingly, the defendant filed an appeal on 13 June 2025 but discontinued it on 16 September 2025. This often indicates that upon further review, the appealing party concluded the trial judge's assessment was appropriate and that continuing the appeal would be unlikely to succeed.
Key Takeaway
Young plaintiffs can receive substantial damages awards that account for their entire working life ahead. The 13% whole person impairment for a cervical spine injury translated into significant economic loss damages, recognizing the long-term impact on Bauer's earning capacity over his career.
First Responders and PTSD: Grapes v AAI Limited [2025] QCA 60
Case Overview
Not all motor vehicle accident claims involve being directly in a collision. Sonia Laura Grapes, a Queensland Ambulance Service paramedic, developed severe PTSD after attending a traumatic motor vehicle accident scene at Mount Tamborine on 2 September 2018.
This case reached the Court of Appeal on a critical issue: limitation periods and what steps an injured person must take to preserve their right to claim.
The Traumatic Scene
Grapes attended a single-vehicle accident where a passenger's arm was almost completely amputated. She retrieved the passenger's humerus bone from a tree during the rescue. The psychological impact was devastating – she was diagnosed with PTSD in January 2021 and ceased work in December 2020.
The Limitation Period Problem
Under Queensland law, motor vehicle accident claims must generally be commenced within three years of the accident. In Grapes' case, this meant the claim needed to be filed by September 2021.
However, Grapes didn't file her claim within this period. In August 2024, she applied for an extension of the limitation period under section 31(2) of the Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld).
Trial Court Decision
The primary judge (Copley J) dismissed the extension application, finding that Grapes had failed to take reasonable steps to identify the driver and CTP insurer before the limitation period expired. The judge found she should have instructed solicitors by mid-2021 (or at latest by April 2023) to pursue identity information.
Court of Appeal Decision
The Court of Appeal (Mullins P, Flanagan JA, Boddice JA) dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial judge's decision. The key findings were:
- Grapes consulted solicitors in May/June 2022 about workers' compensation but did not instruct anyone regarding the MVA claim until November 2023
- This was after she had already discovered the identities of the driver and insurer
- By June 2022, or certainly by April 2023, she could reasonably have retained a solicitor to identify the driver/insurer despite her PTSD
- Because she failed to do so, the driver's identity was not considered "not within her means of knowledge" as required by section 31(2)
Key Takeaway
Time is critical in motor vehicle accident claims. Even if you're suffering from psychological injuries like PTSD, you have an obligation to take reasonable steps to pursue your claim within the limitation period. If you're dealing with workers' compensation issues related to the same incident, you should also be consulting with a lawyer about potential MVA claims at the same time.
What These Cases Mean for Your Motor Vehicle Accident Claim
1. Liability Admission Changes Everything
In both Murphy and Bauer's cases, liability was admitted. This meant they could focus entirely on proving their injuries and damages rather than fighting about who was at fault. When insurers admit liability early, it typically leads to faster resolution and reduced legal costs.
2. Pre-Existing Conditions Don't Bar Recovery
Murphy's case demonstrates that having pre-existing psychiatric conditions doesn't prevent you from recovering damages. Queensland courts carefully assess which injuries were caused by the accident versus which pre-existed, ensuring you're compensated for the harm actually caused by the collision.
3. Young Plaintiffs Receive Future-Focused Awards
Bauer's substantial award at age 22 shows that courts take a long-term view when assessing damages for young plaintiffs. Future economic loss calculations extend over many decades, recognising the long-term impact of injuries sustained early in life.
4. Don't Wait on Limitation Periods
Grapes' unsuccessful appeal serves as a stark warning: limitation periods are strictly enforced. If you're injured in a motor vehicle accident, it is wise to consult a personal injury lawyer as soon as possible – even if you're dealing with other issues like workers' compensation.
Need Help With Your Motor Vehicle Accident Claim?
If you've been injured in a motor vehicle accident in Queensland, time is of the essence. The cases discussed above show that:
- Substantial damages are available when liability is admitted or proven
- Multiple accidents can be assessed together
- Pre-existing conditions don't bar recovery
- Limitation periods are strictly enforced
Don't let time run out on your claim. Contact Roche Legal today to speak with an experienced Queensland personal injury lawyer about your motor vehicle accident claim.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.