Technology Law and Digital Law

Luxembourg has enacted two parallel laws—transposing the EU's NIS 2 Directive on cybersecurity and the CER Directive on critical entity resilience—that together create a comprehensive national framework...

The European Union has reached a provisional political agreement on amendments to the AI Act, introducing targeted changes aimed at reducing administrative burden while maintaining the regulatory framework's core architecture. The agreement extends compliance timelines for high-risk AI systems, strengthens governance through enhanced EU AI Office powers, and introduces new prohibited practices related to AI-generated content.

The European Commission has issued comprehensive interpretive guidelines on high-risk AI system classification under Articles 6(1) and 6(2) of the EU AI Act, while simultaneously postponing key compliance deadlines through the AI Omnibus package.

The European Commission recently published draft guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems under Article 6 of the AI Act. Although the document is non-binding and still open for feedback, the draft guidelines provide the clearest indication to date of how the Commission is likely to interpret one of the most debated aspects of the AI Act in practice: what actually qualifies as a “high-risk AI system”?

As generative AI scales, enterprise clients and creators are increasingly asking tech providers to lift intellectual property, face, and voice guardrails. But under Danish law, supported by EU law and practice, when does a platform’s passive infrastructure position become a high-risk enabling role?

The European Union has reached a provisional political agreement on amendments to the AI Act, introducing targeted changes aimed at reducing administrative burden while maintaining the regulatory framework's core architecture. The agreement extends compliance timelines for high-risk AI systems, strengthens governance through enhanced EU AI Office powers, and introduces new prohibited practices related to AI-generated content.

On the sixth episode of our blockchain series, Counsel Dr. Anastasia Mallerou and Associate Sotiris Kolelis discuss MiCA, the EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation which establishes a comprehensive and harmonized framework governing both the issuance of crypto-assets and the provision of related services.

One of the aims of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 (“MiCA”) is to bring stability to digital asset markets by ensuring that market abuse is prevented before it can even occur.

Austria has introduced comprehensive reforms to its Criminal Code of Procedure to address the challenges of securing crypto assets in criminal investigations. The new provisions establish a legal framework for transferring digital currencies to government-controlled wallets and enable premature realization of volatile crypto holdings.