ARTICLE
14 September 2026

Danish Competition Council – Conditional Clearance Of Uber’s Acquisition Of Dantaxi Subject To Divestiture Commitments

N
Nazali

Contributor

“Nazali is a law firm founded by Ersin Nazali, providing a wide range of legal services (consultancy and litigation in all areas of law) to its national and international clients, through its trustworthy and experienced legal team. There are thirteen partners, forty lawyers, four sworn financial advisors and ten certified public accountants working for Nazali. Our philosophy is quality in delivery, timely response and business minded approach.“
The Danish Competition Council has conditionally approved Uber's acquisition of Dantaxi, Denmark's largest taxi operator, marking the country's first mandatory notification of a below-threshold transaction. The decision requires Uber to divest substantial parts of Dantaxi's business to address concerns about market tipping and reduced competition in Greater Copenhagen's taxi services market.
Denmark Antitrust/Competition Law
Nazali are most popular:
  • within Food, Drugs, Healthcare and Life Sciences topic(s)

The Danish Competition Council has conditionally cleared Uber’s acquisition of Dantaxi subject to commitments, including the divestiture of a substantial part of Dantaxi. Although the transaction, completed on 27 May 2025, fell below the ordinary turnover thresholds, it was called in under Section 12(6) of the Danish Competition Act because of the risk that it could significantly impede effective competition. The decision marks both the Council’s first intervention in an already implemented merger and Denmark’s first mandatory notification of a below-threshold transaction.

Uber re-entered the Danish taxi market in January 2025 through its cooperation with Drivr and had obtained a market share of 10–20% in the sale and intermediation of private taxi services in Greater Copenhagen by May 2025. The acquisition of Dantaxi—then Denmark’s largest taxi undertaking—increased the parties’ combined share of that market to 40–50%.

The Council considered that, absent the transaction, Uber/Drivr and Dantaxi would have continued to compete independently. It identified horizontal unilateral effects, a risk of input foreclosure through restrictions on Drivr’s access to the Uber platform, and potential coordinated effects. Given the market’s strong indirect network effects, single-homing tendencies and switching costs, the Council also found that the transaction materially increased the risk of the market tipping in Uber’s favour. Without remedies, the merger could have resulted in higher prices, lower service quality over time, less favourable terms for taxi operators and increased barriers to entry and expansion. The efficiencies claimed by Uber were not demonstrated to be verifiable, merger-specific and likely to benefit consumers.

Under the commitments, Uber must divest:

  • One of Dantaxi’s two dispatch centres and the associated licence;
  • The Dantaxi trademark;
  • Demand generated through Dantaxi’s app, its 4x48 telephone number and its website;
  • Selected business-customer relationships; and
  • Agreements with taxi operators collectively covering a substantial fleet.

Uber must preserve the viability and competitiveness of the divestment business pending its sale, assist with its transfer to an independent purchaser and shorten the commitment and notice periods applicable to taxi operators within its retained business. 

(Danish Competition Council – 24.08.2026)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More