Hobby Lobby Decision

TC
Thompson Coburn LLP

Contributor

For almost 90 years, Thompson Coburn LLP has provided the quality legal services and counsel our clients demand to achieve their most critical business goals. With more than 380 lawyers and 40 practice areas, we serve clients throughout the United States and beyond.
The Supreme Court held that the contraceptive mandate under the ACA cannot be imposed on a closely held company in violation of the religious beliefs of its owners.
United States Employment and HR

On June 30, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States in a 5-4 decision ruled in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. that, because of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the contraceptive mandate under the Affordable Care Act cannot be imposed on a closely held, for-profit company in violation of the religious beliefs of the company's owners. The decision directly impacts only certain closely-held companies. The long-term impact of the decision is uncertain. Justice Kennedy concurring in the opinion of the Court emphasized the narrowness of the decision while Justice Ginsberg writing in dissent asserted that the decision had "startling breadth."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More