Article
The Supreme Court Of India Clarifies The Scope And Ambit Of The Power Regarding Appointment Of A Substitute Arbitrator; Reiterates That Substitution Preserves Continuity, And Prior Proceedings Remain Valid Unless Either Party Objects
Whether the Bombay HC, while deciding an application for substitution of arbitrator, was justified in holding that the
proceedings held by the earlier arbitrator were liable to be declared as nullity on the premise that those proceedings
were undertaken during the period of moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC?
JSA