ARTICLE
5 October 2021

Three Recent TTAB Inter Partes Decisions Among The End-of-Fiscal-Year Flurry

WG
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.

Contributor

For nearly a century, Wolf Greenfield has helped clients protect their most valuable intellectual property. The firm offers a full range of IP services, including patent prosecution and litigation; post-grant proceedings, including IPRs; opinions and strategic counseling; licensing; intellectual property audits and due diligence; trademark and copyright prosecution and litigation; and other issues related to the commercialization of intellectual property.
The end of the USPTO fiscal year (September 30) yields a flurry of TTAB decisions.
United States Intellectual Property

The end of the USPTO fiscal year (September 30) yields a flurry of TTAB decisions. Among them are the three briefly described below. The Board held oral argument in each of these cases. The three opinions total a whopping 258 pages, so I will merely summarize the issues and link to the opinions.

1117736a.jpg

STX Financing, LLC v. Stacey Michelle Terrazas, Opposition No. 91240829 (September 22, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin) [Sustaining in part and dismissing in part this opposition to registration of the marks BAD MOMS UNLIMITED and BAD MOMS BIBLE for audio books, printed matter, clothing, and charitable foundation services, on the ground of lack of bona fide intent, and likelihood of confusion and dilution of opposer's allegedly famous BAD MOMS mark for various goods and services.]

1117736b.jpg
Theragun, LLC v. Theragen, Inc.
, Opposition No. 91250143 (September 24, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc Bergsman) [Sustaining opposition to registration of THERAGEN and THERAGEN & Design for "Medical devices, namely, electrostimulatory devices for tissue, bone and/or joint treatment, medical treatment apparel, and a kit comprising an electrostimulatory device and medical treatment apparel" in view of the registered mark THERAGUN for massages apparatus and "vibrating apparatus used to stimulate muscles and increase strength and physical performance for health and medical purposes."]

1117736c.jpg

Lisbeth W. Roy, DO, PA v. Charles E. Runels, Jr., Cancellation No. 92065804 (September 30, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Elizabeth A. Dunn) [Granting in part and denying in part a petition for cancellation of registrations for the marks VAMPIRE FACELIFTVAMPIRE BREASTLIFTVAMPIRE NIPPLELIFTVAMPIRE M SHOTVAMPIRE O SHOTVAMPIRE FACIALPRIAPUS SHOTO-SHOT, and ORGASM SHOT for various medical procedures, on the grounds of fraud, genericness, functionality, and mere descriptiveness.]

1117736d.jpg

The TTABlog

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More