ARTICLE
15 September 2021

Finguerra-DuCharme Discusses The Difference Between Rights And Registrations In 'Emoji' Trademark Fight

PC
Pryor Cashman LLP

Contributor

A premier, midsized law firm headquartered in New York City, Pryor Cashman boasts nearly 180 attorneys and offices in both Los Angeles and Miami. From every office, we are known for getting the job done right, and doing it with integrity, efficiency and élan.
Partner Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme, Co-Chair of Pryor Cashman's Trademark Group, recently discussed a recent uptick in trademark cases initiated by German company Emoji Co.
United States Intellectual Property

Partner Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme, Co-Chair of Pryor Cashman's Trademark Group, recently discussed a recent uptick in trademark cases initiated by German company Emoji Co. with Law360. The company possesses several trademark registrations and has recently challenged a number of smaller companies who failed to secure approval for use of the word 'emoji' in certain circumstances. According to Law360:

But trademark registrations aren't the same thing as trademark rights, and a word that's as widely and commonly used as "emoji" is simply a bad raw material to shape into a protected brand, experts say.

"Since the 2014 filing date, the 'emoji' term has become part of the vernacular, making it difficult to function as a single source identifier," said Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme, who co-chairs the trademark practice at Pryor Cashman LLP.

If there was "significant marketplace penetration" sufficient that consumers link the name to Emoji Co. for certain goods, the rights might be stronger, Finguerra-DuCharme said, but "I just don't see that here."

Read the full article in the resource links below.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More