ARTICLE
25 February 2020

SEC Settles Charges Involving ICO, CFTC Takes Action Against Crypto Investment Firm

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
On Wednesday, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that it had settled charges against a blockchain technology startup, Enigma MPC, for violations of federal securities laws.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

On Wednesday, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that it had settled charges against a blockchain technology startup, Enigma MPC, for violations of federal securities laws. The startup, based in San Francisco and Israel, was accused of conducting an unregistered offering of securities in the form of an initial coin offering. The company has agreed to return funds to harmed investors via a claims process, register its tokens as securities, file periodic reports with the SEC and pay a $500,000 penalty.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) also announced recently that it had filed a civil enforcement action against a resident of Colorado and a Colorado LLC, Venture Capital Investments Ltd. The complaint charges that the defendants solicited U.S. residents to trade foreign currency contracts along with bitcoin and other digital assets through a commodity pool they operated. Rather than trade funds raised from approximately 72 individual investors, the defendants allegedly used at least $418,000 of the funds for personal expenses and to make Ponzi-type payments to other pool participants.

For more information and related news, please refer to the following links:

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More