ARTICLE
23 November 2016

Important Developments In Securities Fraud Cases Against Petrobras S.A.

KL
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Contributor

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer is a world-leading global law firm, where our ambition is to help you achieve your goals. Exceptional client service and the pursuit of excellence are at our core. We invest in and care about our client relationships, which is why so many are longstanding. We enjoy breaking new ground, as we have for over 170 years. As a fully integrated transatlantic and transpacific firm, we are where you need us to be. Our footprint is extensive and committed across the world’s largest markets, key financial centres and major growth hubs. At our best tackling complexity and navigating change, we work alongside you on demanding litigation, exacting regulatory work and complex public and private market transactions. We are recognised as leading in these areas. We are immersed in the sectors and challenges that impact you. We are recognised as standing apart in energy, infrastructure and resources. And we’re focused on areas of growth that affect every business across the world.
For those funds that have owned or currently own the ADRs or debt of Petrobras S.A., there are important developments in the securities fraud cases against Petrobras that are pending in federal court in Manhattan.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

For those funds that have owned or currently own the ADRs or debt of Petrobras S.A., the Brazilian state-owned oil company, there are important developments in the securities fraud cases against Petrobras that are pending in federal court in Manhattan. On Oct. 21, 2016, Petrobras announced that it has settled four out of the 27 separate securities fraud actions brought by institutions. Petrobras stated that it has reached settlements with Pimco, Janus, Dodge & Cox and Al Shams Investment Co.  Petrobras further announced that it would record a $353 million reserve against third-quarter earnings to cover these and other potential settlements. Petrobras has repeatedly signaled publicly its intention to put the corruption scandal behind it, and these settlements are a step in that direction. Accordingly, there will likely be further settlements. At this time, individual settlements may be the best option for institutions, as the Second Circuit is now determining on an interlocutory basis whether to reverse the district court's grant of class certification to investors in Petrobras' securities, which covers purchases between Jan. 22, 2010, and July 28, 2015. On Nov. 2, 2016, the Second Circuit held oral argument on the issue, and the members of the panel expressed skepticism about whether class certification is appropriate given the difficulty of ascertaining on a class-wide basis who made U.S. purchases of Petrobras' debt. If the court reverses class certification, investors that desire relief will have little choice but to file individual claims. The Second Circuit is considering the appeal on an expedited basis.

The securities fraud  actions were brought after Brazilian prosecutors announced in the spring of 2015 that they had uncovered a massive bribery and kickback scheme whereby senior employees of Petrobras and the Workers Party of Brazil, which controlled the government and Petrobras, obtained hundreds of millions of dollars in bribes and kickbacks on innumerable Petrobras capital projects spanning many years. This scheme, which has been dubbed by Brazilians the "Lava Jato," or car wash, scandal, has resulted in the indictment and conviction of numerous Petrobras employees and government officials.

To discuss this matter further, please contact Daniel Goldman or Thomas Janover at the contact information listed below.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More