ARTICLE
4 April 2024

Out Of The Shadows: SEC Shines A Light On Insider Trading

KG
K&L Gates LLP

Contributor

At K&L Gates, we foster an inclusive and collaborative environment across our fully integrated global platform that enables us to diligently combine the knowledge and expertise of our lawyers and policy professionals to create teams that provide exceptional client solutions. With offices spanning across five continents, we represent leading global corporations in every major industry, capital markets participants, and ambitious middle-market and emerging growth companies. Our lawyers also serve public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations, and individuals. We are leaders in legal issues related to industries critical to the economies of both the developed and developing worlds—including technology, manufacturing, financial services, health care, energy, and more.
The traditional understanding of how the government charges insider trading is evolving, as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pushes to expand the scope of what constitutes...
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

The traditional understanding of how the government charges insider trading is evolving, as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pushes to expand the scope of what constitutes misappropriation of material non-public information (MNPI) under Rule 10b-5.

On 26 March 2024, the SEC charged Andreas Bechtolsheim, a Silicon Valley founder and executive, with insider trading based on allegations that he misappropriated MNPI. The SEC alleged Bechtolsheim purchased a company's options – through relatives – after learning of the company's impending acquisition through his confidential relationship with another firm. After announcement of the deal, the target company's stock price increased by 35.1%, generating $415,726 in profits for Bechtolsheim.

In a break from the conventional understanding of insider trading, the SEC did not allege that Bechtolsheim received information improperly, either from someone with a duty not to disclose or someone at the target entity. Instead, the SEC alleged Bechtolsheim breached his own duty of trust and confidence. Without admitting or denying the charges, Bechtolsheim agreed to a settlement, including a nearly $1 million civil penalty.

The SEC announced the settlement the same week as opening arguments in SEC v. Panuwat, the SEC's first test of the "shadow trading" theory, where an insider relies on one company's MNPI to trade securities in another company, where the two companies have a significant "market connection."

The SEC alleges that Matthew Panuwat purchased options in a competitor biotech company just before his company's acquisition was announced. According to the SEC, Panuwat's trades were based on confidential information material to the price of the competitor's stock, and he breached both his duty of confidentiality and the insider trading policies of his own company.

The outcome of Panuwat could have a lasting impact on how companies treat material non-public information. Regardless, the Bechtolsheim resolution demonstrates that the SEC will continue to push the boundaries for the foreseeable future.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More