ARTICLE
29 July 2022

SEC And Department Of Justice Announce Parallel Crypto 'Insider Trading' Charges As Regulators And Congress Wrangle Over Regulation Of Digital Assets

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
Notably, the civil case filed by the SEC is its first enforcement action for insider trading of a "crypto asset security."
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

On July 21, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York announced parallel civil and criminal actions (here and here) against a former product manager at Coinbase Global, Inc. ("Coinbase"), the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the United States, as well as his brother and his friend, for an alleged scheme to trade ahead of announcements that certain crypto assets would be "listed" on the exchange. The U.S. Attorney's Office charged the defendants with a criminal wire fraud conspiracy and wire fraud, while the SEC alleged the insider trading scheme constituted securities fraud in violation of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5.

Notably, the civil case filed by the SEC is its first enforcement action for insider trading of a "crypto asset security." (As used in the SEC's complaint, "crypto asset security" refers to "an asset that is issued and/or transferred using distributed ledger or blockchain technology – including, but not limited to, so-called 'digital assets,' 'virtual currencies,' 'coins,' and 'tokens' – and that meets the definition of 'security' under the federal securities laws.") The SEC specifically alleged that the defendants traded in at least 25 crypto assets ahead of more than ten listing announcements, and that nine of the 25 crypto assets were securities.

The criminal case, for its part, closely resembles the "first ever" digital asset insider trading case recently announced by the U.S. Attorney's Office on June 1, 2022. There, the U.S. Attorney's Office charged a former product manager at OpenSea, the largest online marketplace for the purchase and sale of non-fungible tokens ("NFTs"), with wire fraud and money laundering in connection with an alleged scheme to personally trade NFTs ahead of announcements that they would be featured on OpenSea's homepage. These cases do not require that the digital assets meet the definition of "security" under federal securities laws.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More