ARTICLE
16 November 2020

SEC Staff Seek Feedback On Definition Of "Qualified Custodian"

HL
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Contributor

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes matters.

Operating at the intersection of business, finance, and government, we bring an unwavering commitment to client service and the decisive counsel that helps clients achieve exceptional results.

Consistently recognized for innovation across legal services, we combine sharp judgment with deep commercial perspective and intellectual rigor to address critical, cutting-edge challenges.

With 3,100 lawyers worldwide, we offer global scale with strong local insight in the markets that matter most. Our commitment extends beyond client work through pro bono activities, community investment, and responsible business practices.

The SEC Division of Investment Management is seeking feedback on the definition of "qualified custodian" under the SEC's "Custody Rule".
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader are most popular:
  • within Intellectual Property, Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences and Transport topic(s)

The SEC Division of Investment Management ("Division") is seeking feedback on the definition of "qualified custodian" under IAA Rule 206(4)-2 ("Custody of Funds or Securities of Clients by Investment Advisers," or the "Custody Rule"). The request follows the issuance of a no-action letter to the Wyoming Division of Banking which allows a Wyoming-chartered public trust company to serve as a qualified custodian by virtue of being a "bank" under the Advisers Act.

The Division requested feedback on the criteria that a financial institution must meet to be identified as a "qualified custodian". Specifically, Division staff stated an interest in receiving comments on:

  • the extent to which state-chartered trust companies should be treated as qualified custodians;
  • the similarities between the custodial services provided by state-chartered trust companies and those provided by other financial institutions, broker-dealers and futures commission merchants;
  • the criteria that advisers use to assess an entity's satisfaction of the "qualified custodian" definition under the Custody Rule; and
  • how the definition of "qualified custodian" should be liberalized or restricted.

Division staff request responses using the following address: IMOCC@sec.gov with "Custody Rule and Digital Assets" used for the subject line.

Commentary

The Wyoming Division of Banking's no-action letter took a firm stance regarding digital assets, stating that "[a]s a legal matter, the Division views digital assets in the same light as traditional asset classes, and therefore Wyoming trust companies may properly provide custodial services for virtual currency, digital securities and digital consumer assets." The SEC seems to be taking a slower, measured approach by engaging with the market to determine whether there are specific aspects of digital assets that impact the approach to safeguarding and how their response should be tailored accordingly.

Primary Sources

  1. Wyoming Division of Banking No-Action Letter: No-Action Letter on Custody of Digital Assets and Qualified Custodian Status
  2. SEC Statement: Wyoming Division of Banking's "NAL on Custody of Digital Assets and Qualified Custodian Status"

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More