U.S. offshore wind energy planning and development is front and
center and accelerating at light speed. The Biden Administration
announced a commitment to create 30 gigawatts of electricity via
U.S. offshore wind by 2030. Congress provided a boost to offshore
wind development late last year with a 30 percent investment tax
credit to projects that start construction before 2026. In October
2021, U.S. Department of Interior (Interior) Secretary Deb Haaland
announced plans to spur that development by offering up to seven
offshore wind lease sales by 2025 in federal waters off the East,
Gulf, and West coasts. In addition, at the recent COP26 in Glasgow,
Secretary Haaland challenged other countries to join the U.S. in
setting ambitious targets for offshore wind development, and
provide the investments required to achieve them. The Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) within Interior has been busy making
these policy statements a reality. BOEM approved the first
commercial-scale offshore wind project in the U.S. off the coast of
Massachusetts, announced upcoming lease sales for areas off New
York and North Carolina, identified wind energy areas for potential
leasing off the coast of California and is exploring new areas in
the Gulf of Mexico, and will be reviewing at least 16 construction
and operation plans for offshore wind facilities by 2025. And,
that's just the start of it.
For developers, utilities, and investors considering offshore wind
opportunities, early consideration should be given to, among other
things, (1) potential risks under federal environmental laws
related to acquiring such leases and bringing a commercial offshore
wind project online, and (2) actions that can be taken to minimize
such risks.
BOEM's current renewable energy leasing program for the Outer
Continental Shelf (OCS) occurs in four distinct phases:
- Planning and Analysis – This initial phase involves the federal identification of wind energy areas (WEAs), which are areas appropriate for wind energy leasing, after which BOEM gauges the commercial interest in such areas. BOEM estimates that this phase takes one to two years.
- Lease Issuance – After identifying WEAs, BOEM usually holds a competitive lease auction; the winners receive exclusive rights to seek BOEM approval for offshore wind development within specific leased areas. BOEM estimates that this phase takes up to one year.
- Site Assessment – After obtaining a lease, the lessee undertakes efforts to characterize the lease area through various studies and develops and implements a Site Assessment Plan (SAP). The SAP describes the lessee's proposed site assessment activities for the lease area, including planned construction and installation of a meteorological tower or buoys, which requires BOEM approval before such activities can commence. BOEM estimates that it takes roughly one year for the lessee to submit and receive approval of its SAP, and up to five years to complete site assessments and surveys.
- Construction and Operations – In the final phase, the lessee submits a Construction and Operation Plan (COP) for BOEM review and approval. This describes the construction, operations, and conceptual decommissioning plans for onshore and offshore facilities. Upon approval, the lessee can then move forward with construction and operation of the offshore wind project. After submission of a complete COP, BOEM estimates that it takes up to two years for review and approval.
For each phase, BOEM (as the lead agency) and consulting federal
agencies (such as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National
Marine Fisheries Service) must conduct reviews and grant
authorizations as necessary under various federal environmental
laws. At a high level, the primary federal reviews and/or
authorizations fall under the National Environmental Policy Act,
Endangered Species Act, Marine Mammal Protection Act, National
Historic Preservation Act, and Coastal Zone Management Act. In
addition, for each phase, other federal agencies must conduct
reviews and grant authorizations for certain elements of the
proposed activities. Generally, these secondary federal reviews
and/or authorizations fall under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Bald
and Golden Eagle Protection Act, and water and air quality
laws.
Each phase of BOEM's OCS leasing program carries a different
risk profile with three primary risks:
- Delay – The complex array of environmental reviews and authorizations can take a substantial amount of time and resources. BOEM coordinates with the various federal agencies throughout the reviews, and many of the reviews are conducted jointly or simultaneously. However, agencies often take longer than project applicants prefer, especially with complex projects that require reviews and authorizations by multiple federal agencies.
- Mitigation Measures – Agency approvals throughout the phases may be conditioned on mitigation measures or standard operating conditions that are costly or cause operational challenges. For example, as a condition for approving a construction and operation plan, BOEM may require, among other things, specific monitoring, surveying, and reporting, seasonal construction restrictions, turbine placement restrictions, and use of wildlife protection devices.
- Litigation – Although offshore wind development enjoys widespread public support, commercial-scale offshore wind projects still may face opposition and legal challenges. As we have seen with the first U.S. projects, at various phases, opponents may file federal lawsuits alleging that agencies' reviews under certain environmental laws were insufficient, and the decisions should be invalidated.
Developers, utilities, and investors should carefully analyze
and consider the degree to which these three primary risks will
impact the BOEM phases for the specific offshore wind development
project they are considering. The overall risk profiles for each
offshore wind project will differ based on many things, including
location, size, potential impacts to the environment, wildlife,
species, and cultural resources, and local opponents. When
conducting an environmental law risk analysis, developers,
utilities, and investors should consider lessons learned from
offshore wind development in Europe, which is already operating
over 5,000 offshore turbines across twelve countries. As offshore
wind development has progressed in Europe, so has the environmental
regulatory landscape with, among other things, environmental
reviews becoming more robust earlier in the leasing process to
consider the cumulative effects of the offshore projects already
online.
Federal environmental law risk is only one of mainly early
considerations for developers, utilities, and investors considering
offshore wind opportunities. Other early considerations include,
among other things, (1) project finance needs, because an average
offshore wind farm requires billions for site assessment and
surveying, specific project development, construction, operation,
and decommissioning, and, to date, though there are many operating
offshore turbines globally, only one small project has reached
financial close in the US; (2) applicability of production or
investment tax credits and the phasedown provisions based on when
construction begins; and (3) Jones Act-compliance vessels for
pre-construction, construction, operation, maintenance, and
de-commissioning of the offshore wind facilities.
To read this complete article visit
North American Clean Energy.
Visit us at mayerbrown.com
Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe - Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.
© Copyright 2020. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.
This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.