ARTICLE
7 May 2026

FinCEN Residential Real Estate Reporting Rule Struck Down

DG
Davis Graham

Contributor

Davis Graham, one of the Rocky Mountain region’s preeminent law firms, serves clients nationally and internationally, with a strong focus on corporate finance and governance, mergers and acquisitions, natural resources, environmental law, real estate, and complex litigation. Our lawyers have extensive experience working with companies in the energy, mining, technology, hospitality, private equity, and asset management industries. As the exclusive member firm in Colorado for Lex Mundi, the world’s leading network of independent law firms, DGS has access to in-depth experience in 125+ countries worldwide.
On March 19, 2026, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Flowers Title Companies LLC v. Bessent ruled that the U.S. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) exceeded its statutory authority under the Bank Secrecy Act by adopting the “Anti-Money Laundering Regulations for Residential Real Estate Transfers” (the “Rule”), and vacated the Rule effective immediately.
United States Real Estate and Construction
Davis Graham are most popular:
  • within Litigation and Mediation & Arbitration topic(s)
  • with Finance and Tax Executives
  • with readers working within the Business & Consumer Services industries

On March 19, 2026, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Flowers Title Companies LLC v. Bessent1 ruled that the U.S. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) exceeded its statutory authority under the Bank Secrecy Act by adopting the “Anti-Money Laundering Regulations for Residential Real Estate Transfers” (the “Rule”), and vacated the Rule effective immediately2. The Rule would have required certain individuals, such as title insurance agents, escrow agents, and attorneys, to report information about certain residential real estate conveyances when the buyer is a business entity or trust. FinCEN argued that the rule was needed to combat money laundering in real estate, but the court found that the agency did not have the legal authority to impose it.

The court held that the Rule exceeded FinCEN’s statutory authority under the Bank Secrecy Act on two independent grounds. First, the court found that the Bank Secrecy Act allows FinCEN to require reports of “any suspicious transaction”, but the Rule treated all non-financed residential real estate as suspicious, and FinCEN failed to adequately explain how that blanket assumption was justified. Second, the court concluded that the Bank Secrecy Act only authorizes FinCEN to require financial institutions to maintain reporting procedures, not to impose independent substantive reporting obligations.  Because the Rule conflicted with the unambiguous terms of the statute, the court vacated it under the Administrative Procedure Act as the default remedy, finding vacatur appropriate given both the seriousness of the Rule’s deficiencies and the minimal disruption of restoring the pre-Rule status quo.

Footnotes

1 FLOWERS TITLE COMPANIES, LLC, v. SCOTT BESSENT, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Treasury, et al., Memorandum Opinion and Order

2 FLOWERS TITLE COMPANIES, LLC, v. SCOTT BESSENT, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Treasury, et al., Final Judgement

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More