ARTICLE
22 May 2025

CIPA's Cookie Exception Bill (SB 690) Referred To Suspense File & Hearing

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
On May 19, 2025, the California Senate Appropriations Committee, which handles budgetary and financial matters, held a hearing on California Senate Bill 690 (SB 690).
United States Privacy

On May 19, 2025, the California Senate Appropriations Committee, which handles budgetary and financial matters, held a hearing on California Senate Bill 690 (SB 690). The proposed bill would amend the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) by adding an exception to the statute which has the effect of permitting use of tracking technologies for "commercial business purposes."

The Appropriations Committee referred SB 690 to the Suspense File. Generally, if the cost of a bill meets certain fiscal thresholds, the Appropriations Committee will refer the bill to the Suspense File. Having met that threshold, SB 690 will now proceed to a vote-only Suspense Hearing to be held on May 23, 2025. No testimony will be heard during the May 23, 2025 hearing. SB 690 will then either move on to the Senate Floor, or be held in committee. While referral to the Suspense File is not necessarily a death knell to SB 690, statistics show that a number of bills die quietly in the Suspense Hearing due, in part, to its non-public process.

If passed, SB 690 would exempt the use of such online tracking technologies from violating CIPA, provided they are used for a "commercial business purpose" and comply with existing privacy laws like the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). SB 690 could significantly impact current litigation under CIPA for online business activities. Not only will plaintiffs be far less likely to file new lawsuits alleging violations of CIPA, but SB 690's provisions are explicitly made retroactive to any cases pending as of January 1, 2026, which could lead to dismissals of ongoing lawsuits, as well.

Businesses may want to consider engaging their government relations teams or contacting members of the Senate Appropriations Committee to express their positions on the bill.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More