Despite many data privacy enforcement actions being launched against larger tech companies, the Federal Trade Commission recently took action against Drizly and its CEO for a data breach in 2018 (pre-Uber acquisition). Drizly is an online platform for ordering alcohol delivery.
In its complaint, the FTC cited Drizly and its CEO's failure to implement basic security measures - including proper storage and monitoring for threats. Drizly, its CEO, and the FTC agreed to a consent order requiring Drizly to destroy unnecessary data, limit its future collection, and create a data security program.
The important takeaways here are:
- The FTC may start enforcing against start-ups and other small companies;
- The corporate veil may not always shield CEOs and other officers from the FTC's (or any other regulator's) wrath; and
- The privacy and security work that a company does early, while it may take a few dollars from marketing in the near term, will pay incredible dividends later on by avoiding litigation with the FTC, or being sued by private citizens if there is a data breach - the cost of which is higher than ever before.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
