Analysing Arthrex

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
In November 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) ruled that the appointment of administrative patent judges by the Secretary of Commerce was unconstitutional.
United States Intellectual Property

In November 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) ruled that the appointment of administrative patent judges by the Secretary of Commerce was unconstitutional. The at-issue case, Arthrex v Smith & Nephew,  sent shock waves across the U.S. patent industry. But could the ruling be overturned as the case looks set to be heard by the Supreme Court? Is this the biggest issue U.S. patent practitioners are facing right now? Finnegan partner Kathleen Daley joined the Intellectual Property Magazine podcast to discuss the case.

Listen to the full podcast here.

Originally published by Finnegan, July 2020

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More