- within Litigation and Mediation & Arbitration topic(s)
On June 19, 2014, the Supreme Court decided Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International, holding that inventions claiming mere computer implementation of an abstract concept are not patent eligible. 1 This decision informs the analysis for identifying patent ineligible subject matter: A court first determines whether a disputed claim is directed to a law of nature, natural phenomena or abstract concept and, if so, then decides whether the claims as a whole, both individually and ''as an ordered combination,'' contain additional elements that '' 'transform the nature of the claim' into a patent eligible application."2 Courts have referred to this second step as a search for ''something more'' that confers patent eligibility.3 The concern driving this test is pre-emption—patent law must not grant monopolies over the ''building blocks of human ingenuity.''4
Please click here to read the full text/footnotes of this article
Originally published in Bloomberg BNA's Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal, Vol. 90, No. 2215.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
