ARTICLE
22 April 2015

DOJ Guidance On IEEE Letter Hotly Debated

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private equity, sustainable energy, and technology. The world’s most innovative companies trust Mintz to provide expert advice, protect and monetize their IP, negotiate deals, source financing, and solve complex legal challenges. The firm has over 600 attorneys across offices in Boston, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, Washington, DC, San Francisco, San Diego, and Toronto.
This alert summarizes the discussions, the DOJ's defense of its business review letter, and the implications for the high-tech industry.
United States Intellectual Property

The most hotly debated issue at this year's GCR IP & Antitrust Conference, held on April 14 in Washington, DC, was the DOJ's guidance issued in a February business review letter to the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The business review letter says that the DOJ does not intend to challenge proposed changes to the IEEE Standards Association's patent policy aimed at encouraging licensing of standard-essential patents on reasonable and nondiscriminatory (RAND) terms. This alert summarizes the discussions, the DOJ's defense of its business review letter, and the implications for the high-tech industry.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More